首页> 外文OA文献 >Institutional environment, firm ownership, and IPO first-day returns : evidence from China
【2h】

Institutional environment, firm ownership, and IPO first-day returns : evidence from China

机译:机构环境,公司所有权和IPO首日收益:来自中国的证据

摘要

We examine two inconclusive issues in the IPO (initial public offering) underpricing literature. It is unclear whether private firms or state-owned enterprises (SOEs) underprice their IPOs more and how the institutional environment affects IPO underpricing. Using a much larger China IPO sample of SOEs, we conclude that SOEs underprice their IPOs more than private firms. Specifically, SOEs controlled by the central government (CSOEs) underprice their IPOs 27 percentage points more than private firms, whereas SOEs controlled by local governments (LSOEs) underprice theirs 7 percentage points more than those of private firms. Using the National Economic Research Institute Index of Marketization (NERIIM) to measure the institutional environment, we find that one index score improvement in institutional environment is associated with a two percentage-point reduction in IPO underpricing. Importantly, a better institutional environment reduces IPO underpricing most effectively for private firms, followed by LSOEs, and the least for CSOEs.
机译:我们研究了定价不足的IPO(首次公开募股)中的两个不确定性问题。目前尚不清楚私人公司还是国有企业(SOE)对其IPO定价过低,以及机构环境如何影响IPO定价偏低。使用更大得多的国有企业在中国的IPO样本,我们得出的结论是,国有企业对IPO的定价比私有企业低。具体而言,由中央政府控制的国有企业的IPO定价比私营企业低27个百分点,而由地方政府控制的国有企业(LSOEs)的定价比私营企业低7个百分点。使用国家经济研究所市场化指数(NERIIM)来衡量制度环境,我们发现制度环境中的一项指数得分提高与IPO抑价降低两个百分点有关。重要的是,更好的制度环境可以最有效地减少IPO对私人公司的定价偏低,其次是LSOE,而对于CSOE则最少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号