首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of gender grouping on students' group performance, individual achievements and attitudes in computer-supported collaborative learning
【2h】

Effects of gender grouping on students' group performance, individual achievements and attitudes in computer-supported collaborative learning

机译:在计算机支持的协作学习中,性别分组对学生的小组表现,个人成就和态度的影响

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of gender grouping on students' group performance, individual learning achievements and attitudes in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). 588 undergraduate students enrolled in a digital design course were randomly divided into 147 four-student groups that fell into five categories according to the composition of group members' gender, namely 4M (four males), 3M1F (three males and one female), 2M2F (two males and two females), 1M3F (one male and three females) and 4F (four females). Results indicated that: (1) For group performance, 2M2F and 4F groups significantly outperformed the other groups. (2) For individual learning achievements, no significant difference was found in females among different gender grouping interventions; however, males in mixed-gender groups performed significantly better than those in single-gender groups. (3) In terms of individual attitudes, males preferred mixed-gender, gender-balanced, and gender-majority grouping; however, females preferred single-gender and gender-minority grouping. (4) The effect of gender grouping mainly influences students' attitudes, rather than performance. These findings provide evidence that female-only and balanced-gender grouping are two kinds of good grouping interventions that could be recommended for CSCL, and male-minority groups should be avoided because they led to the worst group performance and individual attitudes.
机译:这项研究的目的是检验性别分组对学生在计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)中的表现,个人学习成绩和态度的影响。将588名就读数字设计课程的本科生随机分为147个四组学生,根据组成员的性别组成将其分为五类,即4M(四男),3M1F(三男一女),2M2F (两名男性和两名女性),1M3F(一名男性和三名女性)和4F(两名女性)。结果表明:(1)在组表现方面,2M2F和4F组明显优于其他组。 (2)就个人学习成绩而言,不同性别分组干预措施之间的女性差异无统计学意义;但是,混合性别组中的男性表现明显优于单一性别组中的男性。 (3)就个人态度而言,男性偏爱混合性别,性别平衡和性别多数的群体;但是,女性偏爱单一性别和性别少数群体。 (4)性别分组的影响主要影响学生的态度,而不是表现。这些发现提供了证据,仅女性和性别均衡的分组是可以推荐给CSCL的两种好的分组干预措施,应避免使用男性少数群体,因为它们导致最差的群体表现和个人态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号