首页> 外文OA文献 >Performance of a closed-loop feedback computer-controlled infusion system for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section : a randomized controlled comparison of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine
【2h】

Performance of a closed-loop feedback computer-controlled infusion system for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section : a randomized controlled comparison of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine

机译:剖腹产脊髓麻醉过程中维持血压的闭环反馈计算机控制输注系统的性能:去甲肾上腺素与去氧肾上腺素的随机对照比较

摘要

Closed-loop feedback computer-controlled vasopressor infusion has been previously described for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section but there are limited data available comparing the relative performance of different vasopressors. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine in this system. Data from a randomized, two-arm parallel group, double-blinded controlled trial were reanalyzed. 104 patients scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomized to receive computer-controlled closed-loop infusion of either norepinephrine 5 µg ml−1 or phenylephrine 100 µg ml−1. This was started immediately after induction of spinal anaesthesia and used an algorithm designed to maintain systolic blood pressure near baseline until fetal delivery. Performance error calculations were used to compare the performance of the two vasopressors. The primary outcome was defined as the median absolute performance error. Median performance error, wobble and divergence were also compared. Median absolute performance error was smaller in the norepinephrine group (median 3.79 [interquartile range 2.82–5.17] %) versus the phenylephrine group (4.70 [3.23–6.57] %, P = 0.028). In addition, median performance error was smaller (0.75 [−1.56–2.52] %) versus 2.61 [0.83–4.57] %, P = 0.002) and wobble was smaller (2.85 [2.07–5.17] %) versus 3.39 [2.62–4.90] %, P = 0.028) in the norepinephrine group versus the phenylephrine group. Divergence was similar between groups. The precision of the control of blood pressure was greater with norepinephrine compared with phenylephrine at the drug concentrations used.
机译:先前已经描述了闭环反馈计算机控制的血管加压输注,以在剖腹产的脊髓麻醉过程中维持血压,但比较不同血管加压药的相对性能的数据有限。这项研究的目的是比较去甲肾上腺素和去氧肾上腺素在该系统中的性能。重新分析来自随机,双臂平行组,双盲对照试验的数据。 104名计划在脊柱麻醉下进行选择性剖腹产的患者被随机分配接受计算机控制的闭环输注去甲肾上腺素5 µg ml-1或去氧肾上腺素100 µg ml-1。这是在诱导脊髓麻醉后立即开始的,并使用了一种旨在将收缩压维持在基线附近直至胎儿分娩的算法。使用性能误差计算来比较两个升压药的性能。主要结果定义为中位数绝对性能误差。还比较了中位性能误差,摆动和发散。与去氧肾上腺素组相比,去甲肾上腺素组的中位绝对性能误差较小(中位值3.79 [四分位间距2.82–5.17]%)(4.70 [3.23-6.57]%,P = 0.028)。此外,中位数性能误差较小(0.75 [−1.56–2.52]%)对2.61 [0.83–4.57]%,P = 0.002),摆动较小(2.85 [2.07–5.17]%)对3.39 [2.62-4.90]去甲肾上腺素组相对于去氧肾上腺素组的%,P = 0.028)。群体之间的分歧相似。与去氧肾上腺素相比,去甲肾上腺素在所用药物浓度下控制血压的精度更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号