首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of cervical lymph node vascularity : a comparison of colour Doppler, power Doppler and 3-D power Doppler sonography
【2h】

Evaluation of cervical lymph node vascularity : a comparison of colour Doppler, power Doppler and 3-D power Doppler sonography

机译:颈淋巴结血管的评估:彩色多普勒,功率多普勒和3D功率多普勒超声检查的比较

摘要

This study was undertaken to compare the performance of colour Doppler (CDS), power Doppler (PDS) and 3-D power Doppler sonography (3-D PDS) in the assessment of vascular pattern and vessel displacement of cervical lymph nodes. Colour Doppler (2-D CDS), power Doppler (2-D PDS) and 3-D power Doppler sonograms (3D PDS) of 145 cervical nodes were reviewed (metastases n = 60, lymphoma n = 30, tuberculosis n = 23, reactive n = 25, Kimura disease n = 7). Sonograms of the three imaging modes were reviewed separately with an interval of 2 weeks. Lymph nodes were assessed for the vascular pattern (hilar, peripheral or mixed) and the presence or absence of displacement of hilar vascularity. For the assessment of displacement of hilar vascularity, only lymph nodes that showed hilar or mixed vascularity in the three imaging modes were included in the analysis. Results showed that there was a high level of agreement between CDS and PDS in assessment of vascular patterns (κ = 0.914), whereas the level of agreement between CDS and 3-D PDS (κ = 0.484) and between PDS and 3-D PDS (κ = 0.452) was low. There was a high level of agreement in the assessment of displacement of hilar vascularity among the three imaging modes (CDS and PDS, κ = 0.942; CDS and 3-D PDS, κ = 0.808; PDS and 3-D PDS, κ = 0.865). In the assessment of vascular patterns of cervical lymphadenopathy, CDS and PDS have a similar performance. However, accurate assessment of the vascular pattern of cervical nodes may be difficult using 3-D PDS. In the assessment of displacement of hilar vascularity, the performances of CDS, PDS and 3-D PDS are similar.
机译:本研究旨在比较彩色多普勒(CDS),功率多普勒(PDS)和3-D功率多普勒超声(3-D PDS)在评估颈淋巴结的血管形态和血管移位方面的性能。回顾了145个颈淋巴结的彩色多普勒(2-D CDS),功率多普勒(2-D PDS)和3-D功率多普勒超声图(转移n = 60,淋巴瘤n = 30,结核病n = 23,反应性n = 25,木村病n = 7)。三种成像模式的超声图以2周为间隔分别进行检查。评估淋巴结的血管模式(肝门,外周或混合)以及肝门血管移位的有无。为了评估肺门血管的移位,分析中仅包括在三种成像模式下显示肺门或混合血管的淋巴结。结果表明,CDS和PDS之间在评估血管形态方面有较高的一致性(κ= 0.914),而CDS和3-D PDS之间的一致性(κ= 0.484)以及PDS和3-D PDS之间的一致性水平(κ= 0.452)低。三种成像模式(CDS和PDS,κ= 0.942; CDS和3-D PDS,κ= 0.808; PDS和3-D PDS,κ= 0.865)在评估肺门血管移位方面存在高度共识)。在评估颈淋巴结病的血管模式时,CDS和PDS具有类似的表现。但是,使用3-D PDS可能难以准确评估颈淋巴结的血管形态。在评估肝门血管移位时,CDS,PDS和3-D PDS的性能相似。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ahuja AT; Ying M;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号