首页> 外文OA文献 >Local elections vote shares: the measures used to project local votes nationally are better than looking at the number of seats won or lost, but local voting does differ from general election vote intention
【2h】

Local elections vote shares: the measures used to project local votes nationally are better than looking at the number of seats won or lost, but local voting does differ from general election vote intention

机译:地方选举的投票份额:在全国范围内对地方投票进行投影的措施要好于看赢得或丢失的席位数量,但地方投票的确与大选投票意图有所不同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Local elections often serve as fodder for media outlets and political pundits regarding national trends. Two slightly different indicators, the Projected National Share (PNS) and National Equivalent share of the Vote (NEV), are used to tell us how the parties are doing generally. Looking at these, Stephen Fisher finds that they track each other very closely, and that they tell a related but different story about party fortunes from general election opinion polls.
机译:地方选举通常是媒体和有关国家趋势的政治专家的饲料。预测的国家份额(PNS)和投票的国家当量份额(NEV)这两个略有不同的指标用来告诉我们双方的总体情况。通过查看这些内容,斯蒂芬·费舍尔(Stephen Fisher)发现他们之间的联系非常紧密,并且他们从大选民意测验中讲述了有关党派命运的一个相关但又不同的故事。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fisher Stephen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号