首页> 外文OA文献 >How should we use the Chinese past? Contemporary Confucianism, the 'reorganization of the national heritage,' and non-western histories of thought in a global age
【2h】

How should we use the Chinese past? Contemporary Confucianism, the 'reorganization of the national heritage,' and non-western histories of thought in a global age

机译:我们应该如何利用中国的过去?当代儒学,“民族遗产的重组”和全球化时代的非西方思想史

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this essay I argue that recent philosophical attempts to ‘modernise’ Confucianism rehearse problematic relationships to the past that – far from broadening Confucianism’s appeal beyond its typical borders – end up narrowing its scope as a source of scholarly knowledge. This is because the very attempt to modernise assumes a rupture with a past in which Confucianism was once alive and relevant, fixing its identity to a static historical place disconnected from the present. I go on to explore alternative means of situating past thought to present inquiry, by examining a debate among early 20th-century Chinese intellectuals over the value of their past heritage in a modern age. Their diverse responses undermine the certainty of a singular or persistent Chinese past, enabling a creative presentism that encourages deliberate filiation with alternative ‘tracks’ of past practice and thought.
机译:在本文中,我辩称,最近的“现代化”儒家哲学尝试将有问题的关系重新排布到了过去,这不仅没有将儒家的吸引力扩大到典型的界限之外,反而最终缩小了其作为学术知识来源的范围。这是因为,现代化的尝试是与儒家曾经活着并且相关的过去破裂的,将其身份固定在与现在分离的静态历史场所。通过研究20世纪初期的中国知识分子关于他们过去遗产在现代社会中的价值的辩论,我继续探索了将过去的思想用于提出问题的替代方法。他们的不同回应破坏了单一或持久的中国过去的确定性,从而创造了一种创造性的存在主义,鼓励人们以另类的过去实践和思想“轨迹”来蓄意疏忽。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jenco Leigh;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:10:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号