首页> 外文OA文献 >Disclosing or obscuring? the politics of transparency in climate governance
【2h】

Disclosing or obscuring? the politics of transparency in climate governance

机译:披露或掩盖?气候治理中的透明政治

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Transparency is increasingly evoked within public and private climate governance arrangements as a key means to enhance accountability and improve environmental outcomes. We review assumed links between transparency, accountability and environmental sustainability here, by identifying four rationales underpinning uptake of transparency in governance. We label these democratization, technocratization, marketization and privatization, and assess how they shape the scope and practices of climate disclosure, and to what effect. We find that all four are discernible in climate governance, yet the technocratic and privatization rationales tend to overtake the originally intended (more inclusive, and more public-good oriented) democratization and marketization rationales for transparency, particularly during institutionalization of disclosure systems. This reduces transparency’s potential to enhance accountability or trigger more environmentally sustainable outcomes.
机译:在公共和私人气候治理安排中越来越要求透明,这是加强问责制和改善环境成果的关键手段。我们在此通过确定支持治理透明性的四个基本原理,审查了透明性,问责制和环境可持续性之间的假定联系。我们将这些民主化,技术化,市场化和私有化标记为标签,并评估它们如何影响气候披露的范围和实践以及产生的影响。我们发现,在气候治理中这四个方面都是可以区分的,但是技术专家制和私有化理论趋向于超过透明度的最初意图的民主化和市场化理论(更具有包容性,更加面向公共利益),特别是在公开制度制度化期间。这会降低透明度提高问责制或引发更多环境可持续成果的潜力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gupta Aarti; Mason Michael;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号