首页> 外文OA文献 >Determination of the radiochemical purity of 99mTc-Tetrofosmin: comparision between five methods
【2h】

Determination of the radiochemical purity of 99mTc-Tetrofosmin: comparision between five methods

机译:99mTc-Tetrofosmin放射化学纯度的测定:五种方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

GOAL:The manufacturing and distribution of strips of instant thin-layer chromatography withsilica gel (ITLC-SG) (reference method) is currently discontinued so there is a need for analternative method for the determination of radiochemical purity (RCP) of99mTc-tetrofosmin.This study aims to compare five alternative methods proposed by the producer to determinethe RCP of99mTc-tetrofosmin.METHODS:Nineteen vials of tetrofosminwere radiolabelled with99mTc and the percentages ofthe RCP were determined. Five different methods were compared with the standard RCPtesting method (ITLC-SG, 2x20 cm): Whatman 3MM (1x10 cm) with acetone and dichloro-methane (method 1); Whatman 3MM (1x10 cm) with ethyl acetate (method 2); aluminumoxide-coated plastic thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate (1x10 cm) and ethanol (method 3);Whatman 3MM (2x20 cm) with acetone and dichloro-methane (method 4); solid-phaseextraction method C18 cartridge (method 5).RESULTS:The average values of RCP were 95,30% ± 1,28% (method 1), 93,95 ± 0,61% (method2), 96,85% ± 0,93% (method 3), 92,94% ± 0,99% (method 4) and 96,25% ± 2,57% (method 5)(n=12 each), and 93,15% ± 1,13% for the standard method (n=19). There were statisticalsignificant differences in the values obtained for methods 1 (P=0,001), 3 (P=0,000) and 5(P=0,004), and there were no statistical significant differences in the values obtained formethods 2 (P=0,113) and 4 (P=0,327).CONCLUSION:From theresults obtained, methods 2 and 4 showed a higher correlation withthe standard method. Unlike method 4, method 2 is less time-consuming than the referencemethod and can overcome the problems associated with the solvent toxicity. The remainingmethods (1,3 and 5) tended to overestimate RCP value compared to the standard method.
机译:目标:目前正在停止使用硅胶薄层色谱(ITLC-SG)(参考方法)的条带的制造和销售,因此需要另一种方法来测定99mTc-四磷灵的放射化学纯度(RCP)。这项研究旨在比较生产者提出的测定99mTc-四氟膦的RCP的五种替代方法。方法:用99mTc放射性标记19个四氟膦的小瓶,并确定RCP的百分比。将五种不同的方法与标准RCP测试方法(ITLC-SG,2x20厘米)进行了比较:Whatman 3MM(1x10厘米),含丙酮和二氯甲烷(方法1); Whatman 3MM(1x10 cm),带乙酸乙酯(方法2);氧化铝涂层塑料薄层色谱(TLC)板(1x10 cm)和乙醇(方法3); Whatman 3MM(2x20 cm)含丙酮和二氯甲烷(方法4);结果:RCP的平均值分别为95,30%±1,28%(方法1),93,95±0.61%(方法2),96.85%± 0,93%(方法3),92.94%±0.99%(方法4)和96,25%±2,57%(方法5)(n = 12)和93,15%±1标准方法为(13%)(n = 19)。方法1(P = 0,001),方法3(P = 0,000)和方法5(P = 0,004)所获得的值在统计上有显着差异,方法2(P = 0,113)和方法2所获得的值在统计上没有显着差异。 4(P = 0,327)。结论:根据所得结果,方法2和方法4与标准方法的相关性更高。与方法4不同,方法2比参考方法耗时少,并且可以克服与溶剂毒性有关的问题。与标准方法相比,其余方法(1、3和5)倾向于高估RCP值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号