首页> 外文OA文献 >Bank-based versus Market-based Financial Systems: A Growth-theoretic Analysis
【2h】

Bank-based versus Market-based Financial Systems: A Growth-theoretic Analysis

机译:基于银行的与基于市场的金融系统:增长理论分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We study bank-based and market-based financial systems in an endogenous growth model. Lending to firms is fraught with moral hazard as owner-managers may reduce investment profitability to enjoy private benefits. Bank monitoring partially resolves the agency problem, while market-finance is more ‘hands-off’. A bank-based or market-based system emerges from firm financing choices. It is not possible to say unequivocally which of the two systems is better for growth. The growth rate depends, crucially, on the efficiency of financial and legal institutions. But a bank-based system outperforms a market-based one along other dimensions. Investment and per capita income are higher, and income inequality lower, under a bank-based system. Bank-based systems are more conducive for broad-based industrialization. A temporary income redistribution, under both financial systems, results in permanent improvement in per capita income as well as income distribution.
机译:我们以内生增长模型研究基于银行和基于市场的金融系统。向企业提供贷款存在道德风险,因为所有者经理可能会降低获得私人利益的投资获利能力。银行监控可以部分解决代理商问题,而市场融资则更“放手”。基于银行或基于市场的系统源于公司的融资选择。不可能明确地说这两个系统中哪个更适合增长。增长率至关重要地取决于金融和法律机构的效率。但是基于银行的系统在其他方面要优于基于市场的系统。在银行体系下,投资和人均收入较高,收入不平等程度较低。基于银行的系统更有利于基础广泛的工业化。在这两个金融体系下,收入的临时分配都会导致人均收入和收入分配的永久改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号