首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of several iterative techniques in the solution of symmetric banded equations on a two-pipe Cyber 205
【2h】

Comparison of several iterative techniques in the solution of symmetric banded equations on a two-pipe Cyber 205

机译:两管Cyber​​ 205对称带状方程解的几种迭代技术比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The effectiveness of several iterative techniques for solving matrix equations resulting from finite difference approximations to self-adjoint parabolic and elliptic partial differential equations is reviewed. The techniques include Stone's Strongly Implicit Procedure (SIP) and several conjugate gradient algorithms with varying preconditioners. The comparison is made on a vector machine (two-pipe Cyber 205) where vectorization of the code is done primarily by the vector machine compiler available. It is found that of the methods studied, POLCG (Polynominal Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Method) and MICCG (Modified Incomplete Cholesky Conjugate Gradient Method) appear to require the least amount of central processing time. An advantage of MICCG and POLCG is that it is less sensitive to increasing matrix size. Its disadvantages are that it requires an iteration parameter, has a greater set-up time, and needs more storage than POLCG. (kr)
机译:综述了几种迭代技术求解矩阵方程的有效性,该矩阵方程是由自伴抛物线和椭圆形偏微分方程的有限差分近似产生的。这些技术包括Stone的强隐式过程(SIP)和带有不同预处理器的几种共轭梯度算法。比较是在矢量机(两管Cyber​​ 205)上进行的,其中代码的矢量化主要由可用的矢量机编译器完成。发现在所研究的方法中,POLCG(多项式预处理共轭梯度法)和MICCG(修正的不完全Cholesky共轭梯度法)似乎需要最少的中央处理时间。 MICCG和POLCG的一个优点是,它对增加基质尺寸不敏感。它的缺点是与POLCG相比,它需要迭代参数,设置时间更长,并且需要更多的存储空间。 (kr)

著录项

  • 作者

    Scandrett Clyde;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1988
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号