首页> 外文OA文献 >ABS rules versus reliability based design of bulk carriers: a comparative analysis of ship design approaches
【2h】

ABS rules versus reliability based design of bulk carriers: a comparative analysis of ship design approaches

机译:ABS规则与散货船基于可靠性的设计:船舶设计方法的比较分析

摘要

This paper presents a comparison of the ABS Rules approach for ship design to the recently developed LRPD Reliability Based Design approach. Three elements of the design process are used for comparison. These are the Bottom Plating Thickness, the Bottom Longitudinal Section Modulus and the Hull Section Modulus. The development of the calculations is shown to help understand how the results are achieved. The results are compared in various configurations, which are included in the appendices for reference. The comparisons are evaluated with regard to how well the LRFD results compare to the ABS results for different design criteria. Conclusions are made concerning the relevance of these comparisons to the effort of advocating a move towards LRFD Reliability Based Design procedures. Finally, software development is discussed with a view to the future acceptance of the new approach and the initiation of a transition to LRFD Reliability Based Design procedures.
机译:本文介绍了用于船舶设计的ABS规则方法与最近开发的基于LRPD可靠性的设计方法的比较。设计过程中的三个要素用于比较。这些是底部电镀厚度,底部纵向截面模量和船体截面模量。显示了计算的发展,以帮助您了解如何实现结果。在各种配置中比较了结果,这些配置包含在附录中以供参考。针对不同设计标准,比较了LRFD结果与ABS结果的比较程度。得出结论,这些比较与提倡向LRFD基于可靠性的设计程序的努力的相关性。最后,讨论了软件开发,以期将来接受新方法并启动向基于LRFD可靠性的设计程序的过渡。

著录项

  • 作者

    OSullivan Joseph M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号