首页> 外文OA文献 >Budgeting for National Defense Acquisition: assessing system linkage and the impact of transformation / by Jones, Lawrence R., and Jerry McCaffery.
【2h】

Budgeting for National Defense Acquisition: assessing system linkage and the impact of transformation / by Jones, Lawrence R., and Jerry McCaffery.

机译:国防采购预算:评估系统链接和转型的影响,作者:Jones,Lawrence R.和Jerry McCaffery。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this article we conduct a processual analysis (Barzelay, 2003; Barzelay & Gallego, 2005) to assess evidence and test the following hypothesis: the complicated architecture and processes of national defense planning, programming, budgeting and execution and the defense acquisition decision system lead to unintended and negative consequences for defense acquisition and procurement. The purpose of this article is to identify key points of linkage weakness or failure between DoD financial management and acquisition decision systems. We first describe the PPB system and decision process. We then provide an analysis of recent changes to PPB. Next, we describe the defense acquisition system (DAS) in detail. This leads us, by drawing on interview data, to identify systems linkages and areas of misalignment between the PPBES and the DAS. Finally, we provide conclusions with respect to our hypothesis, analysis of consequent key problems and issues, and areas that require further research.
机译:在本文中,我们进行了过程分析(Barzelay,2003; Barzelay&Gallego,2005),以评估证据并检验以下假设:国防计划,规划,预算和执行以及国防采购决策系统的复杂体系结构和流程对国防采购和采购产生意想不到的负面影响。本文的目的是确定国防部财务管理与收购决策系统之间联系弱点或失败的关键点。我们首先描述PPB系统和决策过程。然后,我们提供对PPB最近更改的分析。接下来,我们详细描述国防采购系统(DAS)。这导致我们通过利用访谈数据来确定PPBES和DAS之间的系统联系和失调区域。最后,我们提供关于我们的假设,对随之而来的关键问题和问题的分析以及需要进一步研究的领域的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号