首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Design-Build to Design-Bid-Build as a project delivery method
【2h】

Comparison of Design-Build to Design-Bid-Build as a project delivery method

机译:作为项目交付方法的设计建造与设计投标建造的比较

摘要

This study evaluates the difference between the Design-Bid-Build (DBB) and Design-Build (DB) project delivery methods. The project delivery method defines the acquisition process, relationships, roles and responsibilities of the project team and the sequence of events to deliver the facility. Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, (SWDIV), has been using both the DBB and DB project delivery methods for the past decade. The most recent four-year period has seen an increase in the use of DB project delivery. This research provides a definitive and comprehensive investigation into the comparative performance of projects delivered using these two methods. A comparison of cost, schedule and quality attributes of the two types of project delivery systems was completed using specific data from 110 military construction (MCON) projects. This study included extracting all MCON projects from the financial information system (FIS) database for the period 1990-2000. The first DB project was delivered in FY 1996, therefore the study focused on MCON projects completed from FY96-2000. All completed MCON projects were used to compare performance of all projects to the focus of this research, Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Category Code 721. This study included interviews to verify the financial information system (FIS) data. A Survey questionnaire was distributed as the primary tool to collect data on quality performance. Several variables critical to project performance identified during interviews, survey questionnaires and data collected from FIS were also included in this study. This research should help in understanding the two project delivery methods to help an owner better select the project delivery system most suited to their specific facility goals or criteria. Results and the level of confidence that surrounds specific findings are presented. This study provides quantitative data to support the selection of a specific delivery system and increase the understanding of the two project delivery systems performance.
机译:本研究评估了设计投标构建(DBB)和设计构建(DB)项目交付方法之间的差异。项目交付方法定义了获取过程,关系,项目团队的角色和职责以及交付设施的事件顺序。海军设施工程司令部(SWDIV)的西南分部在过去十年中一直使用DBB和DB项目交付方法。在最近的四年中,DB项目交付的使用有所增加。这项研究对使用这两种方法交付的项目的比较绩效进行了确定而全面的调查。使用来自110个军事建设(MCON)项目的特定数据,完成了对两种类型的项目交付系统的成本,进度和质量属性的比较。这项研究包括从1990-2000年期间的财务信息系统(FIS)数据库中提取所有MCON项目。第一个数据库项目是在1996财年交付的,因此该研究的重点是96-2000财年完成的MCON项目。使用所有已完成的MCON项目,将所有项目的绩效与本研究的重点(本科入伍宿舍,类别代码721)进行比较。该研究包括访谈,以验证财务信息系统(FIS)数据。分发了调查问卷作为收集质量绩效数据的主要工具。这项研究还包括在访谈,调查问卷和从FIS收集的数据中确定的对项目绩效至关重要的几个变量。这项研究应有助于理解两种项目交付方法,以帮助所有者更好地选择最适合其特定设施目标或标准的项目交付系统。给出了结果和围绕特定发现的置信度。这项研究提供了定量数据,以支持特定交付系统的选择,并增加对两个项目交付系统性能的了解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Allen Linda N.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号