首页> 外文OA文献 >Democracy and Security: The Current Debate on Reforming U.S. Intelligence
【2h】

Democracy and Security: The Current Debate on Reforming U.S. Intelligence

机译:民主与安全:当前关于美国情报改革的辩论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The revelations of Booz Allen Hamilton contractor Edward Snowden regarding the activities of the NationalSecurity Agency (NSA) at home and abroad have focused more attention on the issue of reforming intelligencein the U.S. than at any time since the last major reforms of the 1970s. Whereas in the 1970s the focus wasmainly on the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, this time it is the NSA, which,due to a high level of secrecy, was until recently commonly known as “No Such Agency”. Snowden’s revelationshave received both praise, with appeals in the U.S. and abroad f or him to be granted amnesty, or even beawarded the Nobel Peace prize, and condemnation with him being characterized as a traitor and spy. In orderfor the reader to understand the general issue of reform of U.S. intelligence, I will first call attention to threekey characteristics of the intelligence process in any democracy, and then analyze reform in terms of theinstitutions and processes that would be central to any reform.
机译:博斯·艾伦·汉密尔顿(Booz Allen Hamilton)承包商爱德华·斯诺登(Edward Snowden)对美国国家安全局(NSA)在国内外活动的启示比从1970年代的上一次重大改革以来的任何时候都更加关注美国的情报改革问题。在1970年代,重点主要放在中央情报局和联邦调查局,而这次是国家安全局,由于保密程度高,直到最近才被普遍称为“没有这样的局”。斯诺登的揭露得到了赞扬,在美国和其他国家和地区都呼吁他获得大赦,甚至被授予诺贝尔和平奖,并谴责他被视为叛徒和间谍。为了使读者理解美国情报改革的一般性问题,我将首先提请注意任何民主国家情报程序的三个关键特征,然后再根据对任何改革至关重要的制度和程序来分析改革。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bruneau Thomas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号