首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of nonlinear filters and multi-sensor fusion for tracking boost-phase ballistic missiles
【2h】

A comparison of nonlinear filters and multi-sensor fusion for tracking boost-phase ballistic missiles

机译:非线性滤波器与多传感器融合跟踪助推相弹道导弹的比较

摘要

This report studies two aspects of tracking ballistic missiles during boost phase. The first part compares the performance of several nonlinear filtering algorithms in tracking a single target: the extended Kalman filter (EKF); the unscented Kalman filter (UKF); the particle filter (PF); and the particle filter with UFK update (UPF). Measurements are range, azimuth and elevation. In the absence of measurement error, all algorithms work well except for the PF, which does not converge. With measurement noise (standard deviations of 10 meters and 1 degree) the EFK also performs poorly, while the UPF is the top performer (although it is also the most computationally intensive). The second part compares the extended information filter (EIF) with earlier work on track scoring to perform sensor/data fusion in a multi-hypothesis framework. Here we find that the EIF handily outperformed other fusion algorithms based on track scoring that we tested
机译:该报告研究了在助推阶段跟踪弹道导弹的两个方面。第一部分比较了几种非线性滤波算法在跟踪单个目标时的性能:扩展卡尔曼滤波器(EKF);扩展卡尔曼滤波器(EKF)。无味的卡尔曼滤波器(UKF);粒子过滤器(PF);以及带有UFK更新(UPF)的粒子过滤器。测量范围是范围,方位角和仰角。在没有测量误差的情况下,除PF不会收敛以外,所有算法都可以正常工作。在测量噪声(标准偏差为10米和1度)的情况下,EFK的性能也很差,而UPF的性能最高(尽管它也是计算强度最高的)。第二部分将扩展信息过滤器(EIF)与较早的轨道计分工作进行了比较,以在多假设框架中执行传感器/数据融合。在这里,我们发现基于测试的音轨评分,EIF轻松胜过其他融合算法

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号