首页> 外文OA文献 >Life cycle cost/cost-effectiveness analysis of U.S. Army Recruits : high quality versus low quality
【2h】

Life cycle cost/cost-effectiveness analysis of U.S. Army Recruits : high quality versus low quality

机译:美国陆军新兵生命周期成本/成本效益分析:高质量与低质量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study is conducted to identify tne relationship between a U.S. Army recruit's quality level and his or her life cycle cost (LCC). We develop a LCC spreadsheet model which considers critical costs accrued by an accessed population over a four year life cycle. Actual attrition data for a sample of the year groups under study is built into the model. LCCs of different percentage mixes of high and low quality are compared to find the least cost force mix. Additionally, we conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis by considering hands-on performance test results to determine the effects of performance on the cost to support a high and low quality soldier per man-year, respectively. Finally, we determine the marginal LCC (MLCC) of both high and low quality soldiers and compare these results. We discover through the use of performance factors that high quality recruits are more cost-effective in terms of their MLCC over the course of a first term enlistment.
机译:进行这项研究是为了确定美国陆军新兵的素质水平与其生命周期成本(LCC)之间的关系。我们开发了一个LCC电子表格模型,该模型考虑了四年生命周期中访问的人群产生的关键成本。该模型中包含了所研究年份组样本的实际损耗数据。比较了高质量和低质量的不同百分比混合的LCC,以找到成本最低的混合动力。此外,我们通过考虑动手性能测试结果来进行成本效益分析,以确定性能对每人每年支持高素质和低素质士兵的成本的影响。最后,我们确定高素质和低素质士兵的边际LCC(MLCC)并比较这些结果。通过使用绩效因素,我们发现,在新入职的过程中,高素质的应聘者就其MLCC而言更具成本效益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Funk David M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1994
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号