首页> 外文OA文献 >Effect of antecedent soil moisture on infiltration and preferential flow in texture contrast soils
【2h】

Effect of antecedent soil moisture on infiltration and preferential flow in texture contrast soils

机译:前期土壤水分对质地对比土壤入渗和优先流的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Preferential flow has been shown to be both common and widespread in agricultural soils, however the processes and mechanisms responsible for preferential flow in texture contrast soils have not previously been investigated. Through a combination of dye tracer experiments, soil morphology, in situ soil m oisture monitoring, infiltration studies, and soil water modelling, the effect of antecedent soil moisture on the occurrence, type and depth of preferential flow was investigated in a series of texture contrast soil profiles. Preferential flow was dominated by hydrophobicity induced finger flow in the A1 horizon and bypass flow through shrinkage cracks in the subsoil. Differences between sites in horizon thickness, chemical properties, presence / absence of an A2 horizon, and abundance of sand infills resulted in little variation in preferential flow. At low antecedent soil moisture, dye tracer infiltrated to 85 - 119 cm depth, infiltration bypassed up to 99 % of the soil matrix, and wetting front velocities were estimated up to 12 000 mm hr-1. Perched water tables and subsurface lateral flow did not develop due to the abundance of subsoil shrinkage cracks. At high antecedent soil moisture dye tracer infiltrated to 24 – 40 cm depth. While water repellence had been overcome or leached from the A1 horizon, infiltration of new water was impeded by difficulty displacing existing soil water further down the soil profile. This resulted in wetting front instability and lateral flow through the A1 horizon rather than within the A2 horizon or along the upper surface of the B horizon as reported in the literature. Occurrence of preferential flow was not related to rainfall intensity or rainfall magnitude. Rather, preferential flow was significantly more likely to occur when antecedent soil moisture was below approximately 50 - 60 % PAWC. Water repellence had a profound effect on the development of preferential flow, however the relationship between water repellence and antecedent soil moisture was not straightforward. Potential water repellence varied seasonally in relation to rainfall history in which water repellence was not re-established after rainfall unless input of new hydrophobic substances occurred. Ability to model and predict the frequency and magnitude of preferential flow was limited by poor model performance, attributed to parameter uncertainty and inability to simulate water repellence and lateral flow. Results indicate that in agricultural landscapes which contain texture contrast soils, shallow groundwater and waterways may be at risk of contamination by preferential transport of agrochemicals at low antecedent soil moisture.
机译:优先流动已被证明在农业土壤中普遍存在且普遍存在,然而,先前尚未研究导致质地对比土壤中优先流动的过程和机理。通过结合染料示踪实验,土壤形态学,原位土壤水分监测,入渗研究和土壤水模拟,结合一系列纹理对比,研究了前期土壤水分对优先流的发生,类型和深度的影响。土壤剖面。优先流主要由A1层中的疏水性引起的指流和通过地基中的收缩裂缝的旁路流所主导。层位厚度,化学性质,是否存在A2层位以及大量的沙粒填充之间的差异导致优先流动几乎没有变化。在较低的前期土壤湿度下,染料示踪剂渗透至85-119 cm深度,渗透绕过了高达99%的土壤基质,并且估计的润湿前沿速度高达12 000 mm hr-1。由于存在大量的地下收缩裂缝,因此没有形成地下水位和地下侧向流动。在较高的土壤湿度条件下,染料示踪剂渗透到24 – 40 cm的深度。虽然已经克服了疏水性或从A1层中渗出了水分,但由于难以将现有的土壤水进一步向土壤剖面下移动,​​因此阻碍了新水的渗透。这导致润湿的前部不稳定性和通过A1层而不是在A2层内或沿B层上表面的横向流动。优先流的发生与降雨强度或降雨强度无关。相反,当前期土壤水分低于PAWC的50-60%时,优先流动的可能性更大。拒水对优先流动的发展产生了深远的影响,但是拒水与土壤前期水分之间的关​​系并不直接。与降雨历史有关,潜在的疏水性随季节而变化,在降雨之后,除非输入新的疏水性物质,否则疏水性不会恢复。建模和预测优先流动的频率和幅度的能力受到模型性能不佳的限制,这归因于参数不确定性以及无法模拟疏水性和侧向流动。结果表明,在含有质地对比土壤的农业景观中,较浅的地下水和水路可能会因在较低的土壤湿度下优先运输农药而受到污染的风险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hardie MA;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号