首页> 外文OA文献 >Mafic dykes of the East Antarctic shield : experimental, geochemical and petrological studies focusing on the proterozoic evolution of the crust and mantle
【2h】

Mafic dykes of the East Antarctic shield : experimental, geochemical and petrological studies focusing on the proterozoic evolution of the crust and mantle

机译:东极南极盾构的基性岩脉:侧重于地壳和地幔的元古代演化的实验,地球化学和岩石学研究

摘要

The Vestfold Hills block of the East Antarctic Shield is an Archeanudgranulite facies complex crossed by hundreds of mafic dykes. The dykesudcompose five chemically distinct suites emplaced in three separate magmaticudepisodes during the Early-Middle Proterozoic. Sampling of Chilled marginsudcoupled with detailed documentation of cross-cutting relationships form theudbasis for studying the chemical and temporal evolution of each dyke suite udas well as providing insight into the chemical evolution of theudsubcontinental mantle during the Proterozoic. Furthermore, the emplacementudof the swarms is bracketed by tectonothermal metamorphic events atudca.2500 Ma and ca.1100 Ma. Previous studies of the metamorphic assemblagesudwhich developed during these events have provided constraints on theudP,T, time path of the Shield. A principal purpose of the present study hasudbeen to determine emplacement depths of the dyke suites in order to furtherudrestrict the possible uplift path of the shield during the -1400 Maudinterval separating, the final two major deformations. High pressure experimental techniques were used to determine the loadudpressure at the emplacement depth of two samples representing dyke suitesudintruded at ca.2400 Ma and ca.1360 Ma. This was accomplished byudexperimentally reproducing the chilled margin phenocryst assemblage and theudphase compositions after first rigorously evaluating crystal/liquid KD's toudensure the studied material represented liquid compositions: The resultsudof the experimental studies were also applied to compositionally similaruddykes from the Napier Complex of Enderby Land. The studies indicate theudNapier Complex and the Vestfold Hills are characterized by -2000 Ma ofudcrustal stability following the peak metamorphic event at ca .3100 Ma. Bothudterrains followed identical isobaric cooling paths, to ca.2500 Ma, Afterudwhich the Napier Complex remained at deep crustal levels ( -28 km) untiludca.1000 Ma, while the Vestfold Hills was exhumed at a rate of -1cm/1000 auduntil ca. 1100 Ma. This long period of crustal stability experienced byudboth terrains was terminated by a Himalayan-style tectonic event whichudresulted in isothermal decompression at a minimum net rate of 11cm/1000 audin the Napier Complex, while crustal loading, depressed the Vestfold Hillsudfrom depths of -16 km to -22 km resulting in the formation of garnet in theudmafic dykes. In the absence of more recent deformational events, it isudassumed that these terrains experienced slow, erosion controlled upliftudsince ca.1000 Ma. The oldest undeformed mafic dyke swarm in the Vestfold Hills wasudemplaced at ca.2400 Ma and is composed of two contemporaneous suites, audSi02 -rich, high-Mg tholeiite suite and a Fe-rich tholeiite suite, whichudcompare favourably to basaltic komatiite -Fe tholeiite associations ofudArchean greenstone belts. Normalized plots of incompatible trace elements,udphase compositions, and major element ratios divide the high-Mg suite intoudthree distinct subgroups. The trace element characteristics and isotopicudstudies prohibit these subgroups from being related by crystaludfractionation and previous isotopic studies preclude crustal contaminationudas a source of chemical variations. Major and trace element evaluationudalso indicates that two of the chemically distinct subgroups were derivedudfrom a primitive liquid extracted from "chondritic" mantle sources leavingudan olivine + orthopyroxene residue. Superimposed upon the chondriticudcharacteristics is evidence for selective trace element contaminationudthrough a "wall-rock" reaction-type process, possibly with a plagioclasebearingudlherzolite. Comparison of an estimated parental liquid compositionudwith experimental melting studies indicates magma extraction took place atudpressures of -10 kbar (35 km), consistent with the geochemical signatureudindicating partial melting with a plagioclase-bearing mantle. The moreuddifferentiated Fe-rich tholeiites are depleted in LIL elements compared toudthe high-Mg tholeiites which excludes any simple relationship between theudsuites by a fractional crystallization process. Three petrographically and chemically distinct groups can beudidentified within the Fe-rich suite. Two groups can be related in bothudmajor and trace element variations by crystal fractionation, but fieldudrelationships preclude this simple interpretation. All the groups have REEudpatterns indicating derivation from an unfractionated mantle, whichudprecludes a relationship with the high-Mg suite by polybaric meltudextraction of a single source. The two closely related groups displayudenrichment in P and Zr in excess of that due to crystal fractionation.udThis may represent a relatively deep level wall-rock reaction process asudthe third group displays elemental enrichments identical to that of theudhigh-14g tholeiites (formed at -10 kbar).udThe youngest and volumetrically largest dyke swarm was emplaced inudthe Vestfold Hills at ca.1360 Ma and is dominated by Fe-rich tholeiitesudwith subsidiary, though widespread alkaline dykes. The major and traceudelement diversity of the Fe-rich suite can be accounted for by a crystaludfractionation dominated process. However, the geochemical trends areuddefined by clusters of analyses which in themselves define differentiationudtrends that cannot be related to fractionation of the phenocryst phases. Furthermore, the ordering of the groups does not relate to a simple,udmonotonic emplacement sequence. The nature of the small-scale geochemicaludtrends and the complex emplacement style may be the result of "open system"udmagma chamber processes. Rare earth element profiles, as well as theudincompatible element plots indicate the parental liquids to this suite wereudderived from a primitive source which had not experienced previous meltingudevents.
机译:东极南盾的维斯特福尔丘陵地块是由上古时代的黑泥岩相组成的,由数百个铁镁质岩脉相交。在中元古代早期,堤坝分解了五个在化学上不同的套件,分别放置在三个独立的岩浆旋前体中。寒缘的取样加上横切关系的详细文档,构成了研究每个堤坝套件的化学和时间演变的基础,并提供了对元古代地壳次大陆幔化学演化的了解。此外,群的位置 ud被约2500 Ma和约1100 Ma处的构造热变质事件包围。在这些事件中发展起来的对变质组合的先前研究已经对盾牌的时间路径提供了约束。本研究的主要目的是确定堤坝组的进深,以便在-1400 Ma udinterval分离(最后两个主要变形)期间进一步 u ^限制盾构的可能上升路径。使用高压实验技术确定两个代表堤防套件的样本在安装深度处的荷载负压在大约2400 Ma和大约1360 Ma插入。这是通过以下方式完成的:在首先严格评估晶体/液体KD以确保所研究的材料代表液体成分之后,以实验方式复制冷边缘现象的晶格组合和相形成成分:实验研究的结果也用于组成相似的uddykes来自恩德比土地的纳皮尔综合体。研究表明,在约.3100 Ma的峰值变质事件之后, udNapier复合体和Vestfold Hills的特征是-2000 Ma的地壳稳定性。两种地形都遵循相同的等压降温路径,直到2500 Ma,之后纳皮尔复合体保持在深地壳水平(-28 km)直到 udca·1000 Ma,而Vestfold Hills以-1cm的速度被掘出/ 1000 a uduntil ca. 1100毫安。在两个地形之间经历的长期地壳稳定性被喜马拉雅式构造事件终止,该事件导致等温减压,在纳皮尔综合体中的最低净速率为11cm / 1000 a ud,而地壳加载则压倒了Vestfold Hills从-16 km到-22 km的深度,导致在 udmafic堤中形成了石榴石。在没有最近的变形事件的情况下,假定这些地形经历了缓慢的,侵蚀控制的隆起由于大约1000 Ma。韦斯特福尔山最古老的未变形铁镁质岩堤群已 demplaced约于2400 Ma,由两个同时期的套件组成,即富含udSiO 2的高镁高硫铁榴石套件和富含富铁的黄铁矿套件,与Arudan绿岩带的玄武岩科马铁矿-Fe钙铁矿协会。不相容的痕量元素, u相组成和主要元素比率的归一化图将高Mg套件划分为 uder三个不同的亚组。痕量元素特征和同位素研究阻止了这些亚组通过晶体溶出作用而被关联,并且以前的同位素研究排除了地壳污染以为化学变化的来源。主要和痕量元素评估 ud也表明,两个化学上不同的亚组是从从“软骨”地幔源提取的原始液体中提取的 ud,留下了 udan橄榄石和邻苯二酚残基。通过“壁-岩”反应类型的过程(可能是斜长石的 udhherzolite)叠加在软骨的特征上,可以证明选择性微量元素的污染。估算的母体液体成分的比较/与实验融化研究的比较表明,岩浆提取是在-10 kbar(35 km)的超压下进行的,这与地球化学特征/表明斜斜纹岩幔的部分融化是一致的。与高镁高辉石相比,LIL元素中富集了更多未分化的富铁的高铝矾石,后者通过分步结晶过程排除了富二钙铁之间的任何简单关系。富含铁的套件中可以识别三个岩石学和化学上不同的基团。两组可以通过晶体分级在主要和微量元素变化中相关,但场不相关性排除了这种简单的解释。所有组均具有REE udpatterns表示来自未分级的地幔,这通过单个源的多曲线熔体反引力排除了与高镁套件的关系。这两个密切相关的组显示出的P和Zr富集度超过了晶体分馏所致。 ud这可能代表了一个相对较深的壁-岩石反应过程,因为第三组显示出的元素富集与 udhigh- 14g孔雀石(在-10 kbar处形成)。 ud最年轻,体积最大的堤防群放置在约1360 Ma的Vestfold Hills,由富铁的孔雀石 ud及其附属物主导,尽管广泛存在碱性堤坝。富含铁的套件的主要和痕量/元素的多样性可以由晶体析出为主的过程来解释。但是,地球化学趋势是由分析簇定义的,而分析簇本身定义了与表晶相的分馏无关的分化趋势。此外,组的排序与简单的 udmontonic放置顺序无关。小型地球化学趋势和复杂的安置方式的性质可能是“开放系统” 岩浆室过程的结果。稀土元素分布图和 udincompatible元素图表明该套件的母液来自原始来源,以前没有经历过熔化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kuehner SM;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1986
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号