首页> 外文OA文献 >A blended learning model in higher education: a comparative study of blended learning in UK and Malaysia
【2h】

A blended learning model in higher education: a comparative study of blended learning in UK and Malaysia

机译:高等教育中的混合学习模式:英国和马来西亚的混合学习比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Blended learning, involves the combination of two fields of concern: technology and education; or two groups of people: technologists and educationists. However, current literature shows less consideration on the potential disciplinary gap in the blended learning experience, as a result there is a paucity of evidence from cross-country/institutional/disciplinary investigations. This study aimed to explore, analyse and compare the blended learning experience in higher education. The research is reflected in 3 questions: (1) What are the current blended learning experiences in the selected higher educational institutions? (2) How such experience varies in different disciplines? (3) What are the reflections on the comparative experiences in (1) and (2)? The qualitative case study with comparative methods was used to obtain in-depth findings for these research questions. I visited 4 universities in two countries and sampled 51 research participants’ voices from contrasting disciplines. With these voices, I thoroughly discussed individual case studies, followed by a cross-case and cross-discipline comparison. These findings enabled insights to be drawn on a major argument: blended learning did enable and enhance learning experiences in all case studies but disciplinary differences remain a major challenge. The analysis shows that academics from science-based disciplines have an advantage at the instrumental level of technological usage without transforming learning experience; social science-based academics, due to their disciplinary nature, have embedded technology in wider trans-technical aspects that would enhance and transform learning and teaching. In the context of blended learning, I would argue that learning has not been enhanced (1) if the technology is the sole focus; (2) if the research effort of “technology enhanced learning” does not gain ground in educational theories and (3) does not recognise the disciplinary differences. Arising out of these findings, I proposed a blended learning model that indicates the boundary of the current literature and research findings, and a blended learning definition - an educational-focused process to enhance and transform f2f learning with the blend of technology in a symbiotic relationship. It is necessary for educationists and technologists to establish such a symbiotic relationship and the inter-disciplinary integration and discourse, that may impact on the individuals’ practice beyond their own disciplinary territory.
机译:混合学习涉及两个关注领域的组合:技术和教育;或两类人:技术人员和教育家。但是,目前的文献对混合学习经验中可能存在的学科差距的考虑较少,因此,来自跨国/机构/学科研究的证据很少。本研究旨在探索,分析和比较高等教育中的混合学习经验。该研究反映在三个问题中:(1)在选定的高等教育机构中,当前的混合学习经验是什么? (2)这些经验在不同学科中如何变化? (3)对(1)和(2)中的比较经验有何反映?定性的案例研究与比较方法被用来获得这些研究问题的深入发现。我访问了两个国家的4所大学,并从不同学科中抽取了51位研究参与者的声音。我用这些声音彻底讨论了个别案例研究,然后进行了跨案例和跨学科的比较。这些发现使我们可以从一个主要论点得出见解:在所有案例研究中,混合学习的确可以提高学习经验,但是学科差异仍然是一个重大挑战。分析表明,来自科学学科的学者在技术使用的工具层面上具有优势,而不会改变学习经验。基于社会科学的学者由于其学科性质,已将其技术嵌入更广泛的跨技术方面,这将增强和改变学与教。在混合学习的背景下,我认为学习没有得到增强(1)如果技术是唯一的重点; (2)如果“技术增强型学习”的研究成果未在教育理论中占上风,并且(3)不承认学科差异。基于这些发现,我提出了一个混合学习模型,该模型指明了当前文献和研究发现的边界,并提出了一个混合学习定义-一个以教育为重点的过程,通过共生关系中的技术融合来增强和转化f2f学习。教育学家和技术人员必须建立这种共生关系以及跨学科的整合和话语,这可能会影响个人超出其学科领域的实践。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chew Esyin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号