首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysis of test methods for texture depth evaluation applied in Portugal
【2h】

Analysis of test methods for texture depth evaluation applied in Portugal

机译:葡萄牙采用的纹理深度评估测试方法分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Texture is a surface characteristic which has a very wide influence onpavements functional quality. It is currently assessed by a number of test methods. RoadAdministrations face the problems of dealing with data acquired by different methods and, inaddition to that, the repeatability and reproducibility of the results. This paper presents ananalysis of test methods used for texture depth evaluation in Portugal: the volumetric patchmethod and two methods based on surface profiles. Hence, three roads with low (denseasphalt), medium (“open texture asphalt”) and high (porous asphalt) texture depths wereselected, where five profilometers made five runs. Two subsections of 150 m length were alsoselected to carry out the volumetric patch test. The texture indicators analysed were: the meantexture depth, the mean profile depth and the sensor measured texture depth. The average andthe standard deviation were the statistical parameters used for the analysis. The resultsobtained for each method are significantly different and a good correlation between the meanprofile depth and the sensor measured texture depth was established.
机译:纹理是一种表面特性,对路面的功能质量有很大的影响。目前,它通过多种测试方法进行评估。 RoadAdministrations面临着处理通过不同方法获取的数据的问题,此外,还存在结果的可重复性和可再现性的问题。本文介绍了葡萄牙用于纹理深度评估的测试方法的分析:体积补丁法和基于表面轮廓的两种方法。因此,选择了三个具有低(深层沥青),中等(“开放质地沥青”)和高(多孔沥青)质地深度的道路,其中五个轮廓仪进行了五次测试。还选择了两个长度为150 m的子区域来进行体积斑贴试验。分析的纹理指标为:平均纹理深度,平均轮廓深度和传感器测得的纹理深度。平均值和标准偏差是用于分析的统计参数。每种方法获得的结果明显不同,并且在平均轮廓深度和传感器测得的纹理深度之间建立了良好的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号