首页> 外文OA文献 >Western policies towards sovereign wealth fund equity investments: a comparison of the UK, the EU and the US
【2h】

Western policies towards sovereign wealth fund equity investments: a comparison of the UK, the EU and the US

机译:西方针对主权财富基金股权投资的政策:英国,欧盟和美国的比较

摘要

This policy brief examines how Western nations respond to investment by sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). It sets out two polar positions on such investment: that it is an issue of national security, as it presents important dangers for Western countries; or that it is an economic governance issue, in which SWF investment can be beneficial to Western countries or its problems have been greatly exaggerated. The paper then compares the policies of the UK, EU and US towards equity investment in company equities. The EU and UK have treated SWF equity investment as a matter of free trade and movement of capital, and imposed few specific restrictions; indeed, they have often accepted and welcomed SWF equity investment. On the other hand, the US has often seen strong debates about whether SWF investment is a free trade or a national security issue, and has imposed much stronger legislative monitoring and restrictions.
机译:本政策简报探讨了西方国家如何应对主权财富基金(SWF)的投资。它对此类投资提出了两个极端立场:这是国家安全问题,因为这对西方国家构成了重大危险;或这是一个经济治理问题,主权财富基金的投资可能对西方国家有利,或者它的问题被大大夸大了。然后,本文比较了英国,欧盟和美国对公司股票进行股权投资的政策。欧盟和英国已将主权财富基金的股权投资视为自由贸易和资本流动的问题,并没有施加什么具体限制。实际上,他们经常接受并欢迎SWF股票投资。另一方面,美国经常看到关于主权财富基金投资是自由贸易还是国家安全问题的激烈辩论,并施加了更强大的立法监督和限制。

著录项

  • 作者

    Thatcher Mark;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号