首页> 外文OA文献 >Debating children's susceptibility to persuasion - where does fairness come in? A commentary on the Nairn and Fine versus Ambler debate
【2h】

Debating children's susceptibility to persuasion - where does fairness come in? A commentary on the Nairn and Fine versus Ambler debate

机译:辩论儿童的说服力-公平从何而来?奈恩与菲恩与安布勒辩论的评论

摘要

The article discusses the ethics of advertising to children, examining the processes by which advertising persuades children and whether children aged 12 and under are particularly susceptible to advertising. Little is known about children's recognition and skepticism towards the media environment in 2009, the article states, including items such as viral marketing attempts, brand advocacy, and social networking applications. Other topics include psychologist Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development.
机译:本文讨论了对儿童进行广告宣传的道德规范,研究了广告说服儿童的过程以及12岁及以下的儿童是否特别容易受到广告的影响。文章指出,关于儿童在2009年对媒体环境的认可和怀疑知之甚少,其中包括病毒式营销尝试,品牌宣传和社交网络应用等项目。其他主题包括心理学家让·皮亚杰(Jean Piaget)的认知发展理论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Livingstone Sonia;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号