首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk-takers and referendums: what happens when voters are better-informed?
【2h】

Risk-takers and referendums: what happens when voters are better-informed?

机译:冒险者和公投:当选民了解情况更好时,会发生什么?

摘要

Voting for change in a referendum is the riskier option. People who voted for Brexit were more likely to be risk-takers. But when people have more information at their disposal, are they more or less likely to stick with the status quo? Davide Morisi found that when voters were making up their minds about how to vote in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, the better-informed were more likely to choose Yes. But in a similar study conducted in the run-up to the EU referendum, more information made natural risk-takers slightly less inclined to vote Leave. Depending on their natural inclinations, voters can react very differently to the same arguments.
机译:在全民投票中投票要求变更是比较冒险的选择。投票支持英国退欧的人更有可能冒险。但是,当人们掌握了更多信息时,他们或多或少会坚持现状吗? Davide Morisi发现,当选民决定在2014年苏格兰独立公投中如何投票时,消息灵通的人更有可能选择“是”。但是,在欧盟公投前夕进行的一项类似研究中,更多的信息使自然冒险者略微倾向于投票赞成休假。根据他们的自然倾向,选民对同一论点的反应可能非常不同。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morisi Davide;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号