首页> 外文OA文献 >Land for the landless : conflicting images of rural and urban in South Africa’s land reform programme
【2h】

Land for the landless : conflicting images of rural and urban in South Africa’s land reform programme

机译:为无地者提供土地:南非土地改革计划中农村和城市的形象相互矛盾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

South Africa’s land reform programme has been underpinned by ambivalence about land and what it signifies. One set of discourses and practices shows that ownership of or access to rural land is a key part of many African families’ well-being and livelihood. But it is only a part: small-scale agriculture in South – and southern – Africa has been shown over the past decades to have become impossible without inputs from labour migrant remittances. The corollary is that the desire to acquire or retain access to land exists alongside the (real or desired) capacity to earn money in the urban sector. Land represents a series of things – a sense of security, identity and history – rather than being an asset to be used for farming alone (or at all). But despite this, land has featured in the assumptions of some policy-makers (and some academic researchers, closely associated with them) as a key asset in its own right. Reforming its ownership, and redistributing it to poorer sectors of society is thought to provide the key to solving poverty and inequality, and is seen as the starting point in any real debate about redistributing wealth. Ignoring the interplay of rural and urban sources of income and identity, this set of assumptions is one which envisages the worlds of town and country as separate: it reconstitutes Africans either as rural ‘farmers’ or as urban ‘wage earners’. Ironically, there are striking continuities between this discourse and that of apartheid, with its attempts in the 1950s to promote successful African farmers and in the (linked) attempts to divide urban from rural people through such means as the infamous influx control regulations. This paper reviews published academic work, policy statements, and case studies of labour migrancy and land reform to illustrate some of the contradictory impulses behind, and outcomes or, the land reform programme in the new South Africa. It demonstrates that the idea of rural and urban as separate worlds has been strongly entrenched in South Africa’s ‘development discourse’ from long before apartheid’s demise.
机译:南非的土地改革计划得到了土地及其含义矛盾的支持。一组论述和实践表明,拥有或获得农村土地是许多非洲家庭福祉和生计的关键部分。但这只是一部分:在过去的几十年中,非洲南部和南部的小规模农业已经证明,如果没有劳务移民汇款的投入,这是不可能的。结果是,获得或保留土地使用权的愿望与(实际或期望的)城市部门赚钱的能力同时存在。土地代表了一系列事物-安全感,身份和历史感-而不是单独(或根本)用于耕作的资产。但是尽管如此,土地还是某些决策者(和与之密切相关的一些学术研究者)的假设中的一项重要资产。改革所有权,并将其重新分配给社会中的较贫穷阶层被认为是解决贫困和不平等的关键,并且被视为任何有关重新分配财富的真正辩论的起点。忽略城乡收入和身份来源之间的相互作用,这组假设将城镇和乡村的世界设想为独立的:它将非洲人重构为农村的“农民”或城市的“打工仔”。具有讽刺意味的是,这种话语与种族隔离之间存在着惊人的连续性,在1950年代它试图促进成功的非洲农民,并通过臭名昭著的潮汐控制条例等手段(试图将城市人与农村人分开)。本文回顾了已发表的学术论文,政策声明以及关于移民和土地改革的案例研究,以说明新南非土地改革计划背后的一些矛盾动力,结果或结果。它表明,从种族隔离制度消亡很久以前,农村和城市作为独立世界的想法就已经牢固地根植于南非的“发展话语”中。

著录项

  • 作者

    James Deborah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号