首页> 外文OA文献 >'I don't want you sitting next to me': the macro, meso and micro of gaining and maintaining access to government organisations during ethnographic fieldwork
【2h】

'I don't want you sitting next to me': the macro, meso and micro of gaining and maintaining access to government organisations during ethnographic fieldwork

机译:“我不希望您坐在我旁边”:在民族志田野调查中获得并保持与政府组织的联系的宏观,中观和微观

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The challenges of access in ethnographic research are well-documented in methodological literature, but poorly described inudmany empirical studies. To date, very little research has focused on access to organizations. In this article, I describe the ongoingudaccess challenges in a period of fieldwork in UK Jobcentre Plus (welfare) offices. Access was granted in four phases: organizationaludaccess at a national level (macro), access to individual offices (meso), access to advisors as interview subjects (very limited micro),udand finally access to shadow one welfare advisor (limited micro). However, access to observe multiple advisors (full micro) did notudoccur. In this article, I draw on field notes and interview extracts from advisors as one source of ethnographic data and compareudthese to data generated in interviews with benefit claimants who were recruited from charities and interviewed away fromudJobcentre Plus offices. Differences were found between these two data sources, which highlight that access arrangementsudimpacted on the data collected. Researchers should acknowledge and reflect upon access arrangements at the macro-, meso-, andudmicrolevel in the presentation of ethnographic research findings.
机译:方法学文献中充分记载了民族志研究中获取信息的挑战,但在许多实证研究中却缺乏描述。迄今为止,很少有研究集中在与组织的联系上。在本文中,我描述了英国Jobcentre Plus(福利)办公室在实地调查期间面临的持续 udaccess挑战。授予权限分为四个阶段:在国家/地区级别的组织 udaccess(宏),进入个人办公室(meso),作为面试对象访问顾问(非常有限的微观), ud最后访问影子的福利顾问(有限的微型) )。但是,没有观察到观察多个顾问(完全微型)的权限。在本文中,我将实地记录和顾问的访谈摘录作为人种学数据的一种来源,并将其与从慈善机构招募并在udJobcentre Plus办公室进行访谈的福利索取者的访谈中生成的数据进行比较。在这两个数据源之间发现了差异,这突出表明访问安排对收集的数据有影响。研究人员应在民族志研究结果的介绍中确认并反思宏观,中观和微观层面的获取安排。

著录项

  • 作者

    Grant Aimee;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号