首页> 外文OA文献 >Social referencing and social appraisal: commentary on the Clément and Dukes (2016) and Walle et al. (2016) articles
【2h】

Social referencing and social appraisal: commentary on the Clément and Dukes (2016) and Walle et al. (2016) articles

机译:社交参考和社交评估:《克莱门特和杜克斯》(2016)和Walle等人的评论。 (2016)文章

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We comment on two articles on social referencing and social appraisal. We agree with Walle, Reschke, and Knothe’s (2017) argument that at one level of analysis, social referencing and social appraisal are functionally equivalent: In both cases, another person’s emotional expression is observed and this expression informs the observer’s own emotional reactions and behavior. However, we also agree with Clément and Dukes’s (2017) view that (at another level of analysis), there is an important difference between social referencing and social appraisal. We also argue that they are likely to occur at different stages of emotion process.
机译:我们对有关社会参照和社会评估的两篇文章发表评论。我们同意Walle,Reschke和Knothe(2017)的论点,即在一个分析层面上,社交参照和社交评估在功能上是等效的:在两种情况下,都观察到另一个人的情感表达,并且这种表达可以告知观察者自己的情感反应和行为。但是,我们也同意Clément和Dukes(2017)的观点(在另一个分析层次上),社会参照和社会评估之间存在重要差异。我们还认为,它们很可能发生在情绪过程的不同阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号