首页> 外文OA文献 >The bomb in my backyard, the serpent in my house: environmental justice, risk and the colonisation of attachment
【2h】

The bomb in my backyard, the serpent in my house: environmental justice, risk and the colonisation of attachment

机译:我家后院的炸弹,我家中的蛇:环境正义,风险和依恋殖民

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Theorists have argued that environmental justice requires more than just the fair distribution of environmental benefits and harms. It also requires participation in environmental decisions of those affected by them, and equal recognition of their cultural identities, dimensions most clearly articulated in relation to indigenous struggles, where past devaluation of place-based cultural identities is seen as a source of injustice. I argue for an alternative concept of environmental justice that draws on accounts of how attachment (and place attachment specifically) is constitutive for both self-efficacy and collective agency in the face of an intrinsically uncertain future. Drawing on the work of Peter Marris and using a case study of UK gas pipeline infrastructure, I show how disruption to attachments also disrupts lived strategies for dealing with an uncertain future. The source of injustice involved in such disruption should be viewed as the ‘colonisation of attachment’.
机译:理论家认为,环境正义不仅需要公平分配环境利益和危害。它还需要参与受其影响的人们的环境决策,并平等地承认其文化身份,这是与土著斗争有关的最清楚的方面,过去以地方为基础的文化身份贬值被认为是不公正的根源。我主张采用一种环境正义的替代概念,该概念利用了在面对内在不确定的未来时依恋(特别是依恋)如何构成自我效能感和集体代理的考虑。我利用彼得·马里斯(Peter Marris)的工作,并通过对英国天然气管道基础设施的案例研究,展示了对附件的破坏如何也破坏了应对不确定的未来的生存策略。与这种破坏有关的不公正根源应被视为“依附殖民化”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Groves, Christopher;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 16:01:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号