首页> 外文OA文献 >Systematic review of educational interventions for looked-after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation
【2h】

Systematic review of educational interventions for looked-after children and young people: Recommendations for intervention development and evaluation

机译:对照料儿童和年轻人的教育干预措施的系统评价:干预措施开发和评估的建议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Looked-after children and young people (LACYP) are educationally disadvantaged compared to the general population. A systematic review was conducted of randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions aimed at LACYP aged ≤18 years. Restrictions were not placed on delivery setting or delivery agent. Intervention outcomes were: academic skills; academic achievement and grade completion; special education status; homework completion; school attendance, suspension, and drop-out; number of school placements; teacher-student relationships; school behaviour; and academic attitudes. Fifteen studies reporting on 12 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Nine interventions demonstrated tentative impacts. However, evidence of effectiveness could not be ascertained due to variable methodological quality, as appraised by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Theoretical and methodological recommendations are provided to enhance the development and evaluation of educational interventions.
机译:与普通人群相比,照管的儿童和年轻人(LACYP)在教育上处于不利地位。对随机对照试验进行了系统评价,评估了针对年龄≤18岁的LACYP的干预措施。没有限制交付设置或交付代理。干预结果为:学术技能;学业成绩和年级完成情况;特殊教育状况;完成作业;学校出勤,停学和辍学;学校安置数量;师生关系;学校行为;和学术态度。有15项研究报告了12种干预措施,符合纳入标准。九项干预措施产生了初步影响。但是,如Cochrane偏倚风险工具所评估的,由于方法论质量参差不齐,因此无法确定有效性的证据。提供了理论和方法上的建议,以促进教育干预措施的发展和评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号