首页> 外文OA文献 >Speeding up or reaching out? Efficiency and unmet need as policy priorities in Wales
【2h】

Speeding up or reaching out? Efficiency and unmet need as policy priorities in Wales

机译:加速还是伸出援手?效率和需求缺口是威尔士的政策重点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Welsh Assembly, a devolved legislature in the UK, and its executive the Welsh Government, have a distinctly intensive commitment to equality – emphasising universality with weighty obligations on public services. This article uses the ‘discourse-historical approach’ (DHA) to critically review an eleven-year social service reform strategy (produced in 2007), and to weigh up the priorities of fiscal efficiency and universal equality. We refer to these competing priorities as ‘speeding up’ and ‘reaching out’, respectively. Our findings show an imbalance towards the former, largely sidelining the possible value of services to those currently under-served. The article discusses this mismatch in respect of the dominant policymaking framework of ‘New Public Management’ and its emphases on productivity, efficiency, and quantifiable accountability. We also show the value of DHA in analysing ‘fights for dominance’ – in this case between competing discourses within a flagship policy document.
机译:威尔士议会是英国下放的立法机构,其执行机构威尔士政府对平等有着明显的密集承诺-强调普遍性,对公共服务负有沉重的义务。本文使用“历史话语方法”(DHA)来批判性地审查一项为期11年的社会服务改革策略(于2007年制定),并权衡了财政效率和普遍平等的优先事项。我们将这些相互竞争的优先事项分别称为“加速”和“拓展”。我们的研究结果表明,与前者之间存在不平衡,主要是掩盖了当前服务不足的服务的可能价值。本文讨论了有关“新公共管理”的主要决策框架及其在生产力,效率和可量化问责制方面的不匹配问题。我们还展示了DHA在分析“争夺主导权”中的价值-在这种情况下,这是旗舰政策文件中相互竞争的论述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号