首页> 外文OA文献 >Neuro-cognitive impairments and the criminal justice system: a case analysis of the impact of diagnoses of FASD and ADHD on the sentencing of offenders in the courts of three Canadian provinces
【2h】

Neuro-cognitive impairments and the criminal justice system: a case analysis of the impact of diagnoses of FASD and ADHD on the sentencing of offenders in the courts of three Canadian provinces

机译:神经认知障碍和刑事司法系统:对加拿大三个省法院对FASD和ADHD诊断的判刑影响的案例分析

摘要

There has been growing awareness that persons with cognitive impairments, such as Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, (ADHD) experience difficulties functioning in society and more specifically, within the justice system after they come into conflict with the law. Very few studies, however, have focused on how such individuals are treated in the criminal justice system and more specifically, whether the justice system is properly meeting their needs. Impairments, such as FASD and ADHD, are organic brain disorders which the courts often fail to recognize. There is a paucity of research which examines the impact of ADHD and FASD on the accused in the Canadian courtroom. In order to determine whether the presence of ADHD and FASD exerts any effect on the final sentencing disposition in criminal cases, particular attention was paid to the role of judicial interpretation and expert testimony regarding these specific neuro-cognitive impairments. This research presents the findings of an exploratory case analysis of the impact of diagnoses of FASD and ADHD on the sentencing of offenders in the courts of three Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Ontario. The major findings reveal that there appears to be an overrepresentation of FASD cases in the Western provinces of British Columbia and Saskatchewan for both youths and adults, when compared with the Eastern province of Ontario. It was also observed that Aboriginal accused with FASD were over-represented in the courts, which was not the case for aboriginal accused with ADHD. Furthermore, when considering sentencing decisions in adult court, judges did not place as much weight on ADHD as they did on FASD. Also, it was observed that more often than not, no formal assessment of FASD was conducted during the court process. It is recommended that, when judges sentence offenders with FASD/ADHD, the focus needs to be placed on changing their living situation or social situation rather than fixating on their behaviour. Providing these individuals with structure, support and treatment - as well as surveillance and enforcement - in the community is more likely to secure a successful outcome for the sentencing process.
机译:越来越多的人意识到,认知障碍的人,例如胎儿酒精频谱障碍(FASD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD),在与法律发生冲突后,在社会中,尤其是在司法系统中,会遇到困难。但是,很少有研究集中于如何在刑事司法系统中对待这类人,更具体地说,是司法系统是否能够适当满足他们的需求。 FASD和ADHD等障碍是器质性脑部疾病,法院通常无法识别。很少有研究检查多动症和FASD对加拿大法庭被告的影响。为了确定ADHD和FASD的存在是否会对刑事案件中的最终判决结果产生任何影响,特别注意了司法解释和专家证词在这些特定的神经认知障碍中的作用。这项研究提出了对加拿大三个省:不列颠哥伦比亚省,萨斯喀彻温省和安大略省的FASD和ADHD诊断对罪犯判刑影响的探索性案例分析结果。主要发现表明,与东部安大略省相比,西部不列颠哥伦比亚省和萨斯喀彻温省的青年和成人FASD病例过多。还观察到,FASD的原住民被告在法院中的代表人数过多,ADHD的原住民被告并非如此。此外,在成人法院考虑量刑判决时,法官对注意力缺陷多动症的重视程度不如对FASD的重视程度。此外,据观察,在法庭程序中,通常没有对FASD进行正式评估。建议当法官以FASD / ADHD判罪者时,应将重点放在改变他们的生活状况或社会状况上,而不是仅仅关注他们的行为。在社区中为这些人提供结构,支持和治疗以及监视和执法,更有可能确保量刑过程取得成功。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jonas Vidovic Petra;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号