首页> 外文OA文献 >Norway 'must really drop their absurd claims such as that to the Otto Sverdrup Islands.' Bi-polar international diplomacy: The Sverdrup Islands question, 1902-1930
【2h】

Norway 'must really drop their absurd claims such as that to the Otto Sverdrup Islands.' Bi-polar international diplomacy: The Sverdrup Islands question, 1902-1930

机译:挪威“必须真正放弃他们对奥托斯维尔德鲁普群岛的荒谬主张”。双向国际外交:1902-1930年的斯维尔杜普群岛问题

摘要

This thesis examines the international context of Norway’s acknowledgement of Canadian title to the Sverdrup Islands in 1930. By drawing on a hitherto unpublished combination of British and Norwegian primary sources plus a wide range of secondary material this thesis offers new perspectives on the historical background of Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic Archipelago. The Sverdrup agreement was deeply embedded in the wider context of British expansion in Antarctica and Norwegian actions in both the Arctic and Antarctica. Arctic and Antarctic policies were intrinsically connected as political moves in either of the continents could, and did, develop legal precedents in the wider bi-polar context. The agreement reached over the Sverdrup Islands was an intricate compromise that involved no transaction or sale of territory. Rather, the settlement represented a confirmation of existing claims and policies in the bi-polar context that served to further the expansionist objectives of Norway, Canada and Britain.
机译:本文研究了1930年挪威承认加拿大对斯维尔德鲁普群岛的称号的国际背景。通过借鉴迄今尚未出版的英国和挪威主要文献资料以及广泛的辅助材料,该论文为加拿大的历史背景提供了新的见解。北极群岛的主权。 Sverdrup协议深深地植根于英国在南极扩张和挪威在北极和南极行动中的更广泛环境中。北极和南极的政策之间有着内在的联系,因为在任何一个大陆上的政治行动都可以而且确实在更广泛的两极环境中发展了法律先例。斯维尔德鲁普群岛达成的协议是一项复杂的妥协,不涉及领土交易或出售。相反,和解代表了在两极背景下对现有债权和政策的确认,这有助于进一步推动挪威,加拿大和英国的扩张主义目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号