首页> 外文OA文献 >International Institutions and Global Governance: The Turn to Mechanisms and Process (SWP 26)
【2h】

International Institutions and Global Governance: The Turn to Mechanisms and Process (SWP 26)

机译:国际机构与全球治理:转向机制与程序(SWP 26)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The past decade has seen a sustained move by students of international institutions and organizations to viewing their subject matter as independent variables affecting state interests and policy. Conceptually, this has put a premium on identifying the mechanisms connecting institutions to states; methodologically, there has been a growing concern with measuring process. While this move has produced rich and analytically rigorous studies that demonstrate the multiple roles – good and bad – institutions play in global politics, significant challenges remain. In terms of design, scholars often neglect the problem of equifinality – where multiple causal pathways may lead to the same outcome – and instead conduct process tracing only on their preferred argument. Theoretically, the focus on process seems to reduce the power and generalizability of arguments about institutions. Finally, the potential for process tracing to help combine rationalist and constructivist insights remains largely unfulfilled.
机译:在过去的十年中,国际机构和组织的学生不断采取行动,将其主题视为影响国家利益和政策的独立变量。从概念上讲,这在确定机构与国家之间的联系机制上显得尤为重要。从方法上讲,测量过程已引起越来越多的关注。尽管此举产生了丰富且分析严谨的研究,这些研究表明了机构在全球政治中所起的好与坏的多重作用,但仍然存在重大挑战。在设计方面,学者们经常忽略均等性的问题(在这里,多种因果关系可能导致相同的结果),而是仅根据他们的首选论点进行过程追踪。从理论上讲,对过程的关注似乎降低了关于制度的论点的力量和普遍性。最后,仍无法实现过程跟踪以帮助结合理性主义和建构主义见解的潜力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Checkel Jeffrey T.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号