首页> 外文OA文献 >Without a “dog’s chance:” the Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland’s “trapped” nationalist minority, and the Irish boundary question, 1921-1925
【2h】

Without a “dog’s chance:” the Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland’s “trapped” nationalist minority, and the Irish boundary question, 1921-1925

机译:没有“碰碰运气”的机会:德文利特爱尔兰新闻,北爱尔兰的“被困”民族主义者和爱尔兰的边界问题,1921-1925年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Between 1920 and 1922 Ireland was partitioned and two new polities emerged: the overwhelmingly Catholic and nationalist Irish Free State, and Northern Ireland, which was largely Protestant and unionist. These polities were not homogeneous, however, and the existence of a small unionist minority in the Free State and a more significant nationalist minority in Northern Ireland necessitated the establishment of a Boundary Commission in order to redraw the border. This thesis is a study of Northern Ireland’s divided nationalist minority and their relationship with Southern nationalists during the period between the onset of partition and the collapse of the Boundary Commission in 1925. While my focus on the relationship between Northern and Southern nationalism is itself unique, “Without a ‘Dog’s Chance’” breaks new ground by demonstrating how Northern Ireland’s nationalist minority represented an example of what Israeli anthropologist Dan Rabinowitz has called a “trapped minority.” My use of the hitherto ignored poetry that appeared in Northern Ireland’s nationalist press also sets this work apart from the existing historiography. Whereas the trapped minority model provides a way of conceptualizing Northern nationalism as a component of the wider Irish nationalist movement, incorporating poetry into the discussion of the relations between the trapped Northern minority and the Irish “mother nation” reveals a new dimension to the feelings of angst, betrayal, and victimization that were embedded in the politics of Northern nationalism. Although this project concentrates on the constitutionally-minded supporters of West Belfast MP Joseph Devlin and the Devlinite Irish News, their border-dwelling Sinn Féin competitors are by no means ignored. While Free State strong-man Kevin O’Higgins was unequivocally correct when he suggested that tensions between the Devlinites and the Sinn Féiners were exacerbated because the former did not have “a dog’s chance of getting out of the Boundary area” and the latter did, this thesis argues that individuals belonging to both political traditions witnessed the diminishment of their nationalist credentials after partition. Feeling under-valued, abandoned, and exploited by their peers in the South, the nationalists of Northern Ireland were also marginalized within a host state that regarded them with fear and suspicion.
机译:在1920年至1922年之间,爱尔兰被分割,出现了两个新政体:绝大多数是天主教徒和民族主义的爱尔兰自由邦,以及主要是新教徒和工会主义者的北爱尔兰。但是,这些政体并不统一,在自由州有一个较小的工会主义少数派,而在北爱尔兰则有一个更重要的民族主义少数派,因此有必要成立一个边界委员会来重划边界。本文是对北爱尔兰分裂的民族主义少数派及其在1925年开始分裂和边界委员会崩溃之间的与南方民族主义者的关系的研究。虽然我对北方和南方民族主义之间的关系的关注本身是独一无二的, “没有'狗的机会'”通过展示北爱尔兰民族主义少数民族如何代表以色列人类学家丹·拉比诺维茨(Dan Rabinowitz)称为“被困少数民族”的例子,开创了新局面。我对北爱尔兰民族主义媒体上迄今无视的诗歌的使用也使这项工作与现有的史学有所不同。尽管被困少数群体模式提供了一种将北方民族主义概念化为更广泛的爱尔兰民族主义运动的组成部分的方式,但将诗歌纳入对被困北方少数族裔与爱尔兰“母国”之间关系的讨论中,却揭示了人们情感的新维度。嵌入在北方民族主义政治中的焦虑,背叛和受害。尽管该项目集中在西贝尔法斯特国会议员约瑟夫·德夫林和《德夫林人爱尔兰新闻》的宪政支持者身上,但他们在边界附近的辛恩·费因的竞争对手绝不被忽略。自由州强人凯文·奥希金斯(Kevin O'Higgins)明确指出了德文利人与辛恩·费纳人之间的紧张局势是正确的,因为前者没有“狗有机会离开边界地区”,而后者确实有,本论文认为,属于两种政治传统的人在分治后都见证了其民族主义资格的减少。北爱尔兰的民族主义者感到自己被南方的同龄人低估,抛弃和剥削,因此在一个以恐惧和猜疑对待他们的东道国中也被边缘化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cousins James A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号