首页> 外文OA文献 >The Google Book Settlement: The Net Benefits of Private Contract Precedence in the Absence of Adequate Copyright Law
【2h】

The Google Book Settlement: The Net Benefits of Private Contract Precedence in the Absence of Adequate Copyright Law

机译:Google图书和解:缺乏适当版权法的私人合同优先权的净收益

摘要

Internet search giant Google Inc. began digitizing library collections in 2004, confident that scanning and indexing books to display excerpts based on users’ search queries were fair uses under US copyright law. Authors and publishers disagreed, and in 2005 representatives filed class action copyright infringement complaints. Rather than litigate, the parties negotiated a settlement that not only allowed Google’s original uses but licensed Google to use, and sell online, millions of books published before 5 January 2009. This report uses the experience of Canadian scholarly publisher University of British Columbia Press to illuminate the 13 November 2009 proposed amended settlement agreement’s technical details, and examines the settlement’s economic and cultural costs and benefits and its implications for digital publishing, public access, and copyright law in a rapidly developing digital market. Whatever this settlement’s outcome, its proposal underlines the need for meaningful, legislative copyright reform capable of encompassing present technological realities.
机译:互联网搜索巨头Google Inc.从2004年开始对图书馆馆藏进行数字化,确信根据美国版权法,对书籍进行扫描和索引编制以显示基于用户搜索查询的摘录是合理的使用。作者和出版商不同意,2005年,代表们提起了集体诉讼侵犯版权的投诉。双方没有进行诉讼,而是达成了一项和解协议,该协议不仅允许Google的原始使用,还许可Google使用和在线销售2009年1月5日之前出版的数百万本书。本报告利用加拿大学术出版商不列颠哥伦比亚大学的经验阐明了2009年11月13日拟议中的和解协议修订案的技术细节,并研究了和解的经济和文化成本与收益及其在快速发展的数字市场中对数字出版,公共访问和版权法的影响。无论该和解的结果如何,其提案都强调需要进行有意义的立法性版权改革,以涵盖当前的技术现实。

著录项

  • 作者

    Newman Jenna Cei M;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号