首页> 外文OA文献 >Why we may need to reconsider the current one-size fits all approach to US housing policy.
【2h】

Why we may need to reconsider the current one-size fits all approach to US housing policy.

机译:为什么我们可能需要重新考虑当前的“一刀切”方案以适应美国的住房政策。

摘要

Every year, the US federal government spends billions on low-income rental housing assistance. But is it spending this money effectively by using housing vouchers? In new research using panel data from rental units, Michael Eriksen and Amanda Ross find that the effects of housing vouchers vary from city to city. Introducing vouchers can drive up rents by increasing the demand of those who receive them for higher quality rental housing, but decrease demand and thus rent for lower quality accommodation. They show higher rent increases occur in areas where housing supply is inelastic due to a lack of developable land suggesting alternative place-based housing policies may be more effective in those areas.
机译:每年,美国联邦政府在低收入租赁住房援助上花费数十亿美元。但是,它是否通过使用住房券有效地花费了这笔钱?在使用来自出租单位的面板数据的最新研究中,迈克尔·埃里克森和阿曼达·罗斯发现,住房券的效果因城市而异。引入代金券可以通过增加接受代金券的人对更高品质的租赁住房的需求来拉高租金,但减少需求,从而降低低品质住房的租金。他们显示,在由于缺乏可开发土地而住房供应缺乏弹性的地区,租金上涨较高,这表明在这些地区,替代性的按地住房政策可能更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号