首页> 外文OA文献 >Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dan Discovery Learning (DL) Pada Siswa Kelas VII Semester Genap SMP Negeri 1 Gondangrejo Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015
【2h】

Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dan Discovery Learning (DL) Pada Siswa Kelas VII Semester Genap SMP Negeri 1 Gondangrejo Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015

机译:为SMP Negeri的VII级甚至学期的学生使用基于问题的学习(PBL)和发现学习(DL)模型的2013年数学课程实施情况1刚丹里茹2014/2015学年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Lots of teachers are still using conventional learning models in delivering the lessons in class, so students are less motivated to learn, especially in the implementation of Curriculum 2013 teachers are required to be more creative in the classroom that can deliver the materials to make children more active, creative and innovative. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the model of Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Discovery Learning (DL) in the implementation of the Curriculum in 2013 on learning outcomes. The study was conducted using anudexperimental method with the number of treatment as much as 2 are grouped into classes for the first experimental model of Problem Based Learning (PBL) and the experimental class to model Discovery Learning (DL). From the results of theudanalysis using independent t-test without control samples obtained t value of 3.483, while the value of t table (0.05; 62) is 1.625.The results showed that there were significant differences in learning outcomes with the use of the model of Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Discovery Learning (DL) in the implementation of Curriculum 2013. To find a better learning model, can be seen by looking at the average of the learning outcomes of each group. Turns out after further analysis, the groups subjected to theudmodel of Problem Based Learning (PBL) has a higher average of 2,881, this means that the model of Problem Based Learning (PBL) is better than model DiscoveryudLearning(DL).
机译:许多老师仍在使用传统的学习模式来上课,因此学生的学习动机降低,尤其是在实施《 2013年课程》时,要求老师在课堂上更具创造力,以便提供使孩子们成长的材料。积极,创新和创新。这项研究的目的是确定基于问题的学习(PBL)和发现学习(DL)模型在2013年课程实施中对学习成果的影响。该研究是使用实验方法进行的,针对基于问题的学习的第一个实验模型(PBL)和针对发现学习的模型(DL)的实验类,将多达2种治疗方法分组。从无对照样本的独立t检验的分析结果中,t值为3.483,而t表(0.05; 62)的值为1.625。结果表明,使用t的学习结果存在显着差异。在课程2013的实施中采用了基于问题的学习(PBL)和发现学习(DL)的模型。要找到更好的学习模型,可以通过查看每组学习结果的平均值来看出。经过进一步分析后发现,接受基于问题的学习(PBL)的模型的组的平均值更高,为2,881,这意味着基于问题的学习(PBL)的模型优于发现(ud)的模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Astuti Mega;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号