首页> 外文OA文献 >Imperial mission, ‘scientific’ method:udan alternative account of the origins of IR
【2h】

Imperial mission, ‘scientific’ method:udan alternative account of the origins of IR

机译:帝国宣教,“科学”方法: ud投资者关系起源的另一种说法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article offers an alternative account of the origins of academic IR to the conventional Aberystwyth-centered one. Informed by a close reading of the archive, our narrative proposes that the ideas and method of what was to become IR were first developed in South Africa. Here, we suggest how the creation of a racially-ordered state served as a template for the British Commonwealth and later the World State. We draw further on the British dominions’ tour of Lionel Curtis, founder of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), between September 1909 and March 1911, to indicate how Edwardian anxieties about the future of empire fuelled the missionary zeal of imperial enthusiasts, who placed enormous trust in the ‘scientific method’ to create a unified empire. This method and the same ideas were to become central features of the new discipline of IR. By highlighting the transnational circulation of these ideas, we also provide an alternative to the nationally-limited revisionist accounts.
机译:本文提供了以传统阿伯里斯特威斯为中心的学术IR起源的另一种说法。通过对档案的仔细阅读,我们的叙述表明,要成为IR的想法和方法最早是在南非提出的。在这里,我们建议创建种族有序的国家如何作为英联邦以及后来的世界国家的模板。我们进一步借鉴英国统治者在1909年9月至1911年3月之间皇家国际事务学院(RIIA)创始人莱昂内尔·柯蒂斯(Lionel Curtis)的访问之行,以表明爱德华时代对帝国未来的担忧如何激发了宣教士对帝国发烧友的热情,他们对建立一个统一帝国的“科学方法”寄予了极大的信任。这种方法和相同的想法成为IR新学科的主要特征。通过强调这些思想的跨国传播,我们还提供了替代国家限制的修正主义者的说法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号