首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative life cycle assessment review of conventional pulverized coal-fired electricity generation and underground coal gasification (UCG) linked with an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC)
【2h】

A comparative life cycle assessment review of conventional pulverized coal-fired electricity generation and underground coal gasification (UCG) linked with an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC)

机译:常规粉煤发电和地下煤气化(UCG)与整体煤气化联合循环(IGCC)相关的比较生命周期评估审查

摘要

In a global climate where sustainable development is being prioritized for the benefit of current and futureudgenerations, it is necessary to make informed decisions about the type of technologies being deployed.udBecause coal plays such a significant role in the generation of electricity, understanding the impact it hasudon the environment is an important part of understanding energy and environmental issues in general. Toudthis end, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed on two methods of electricity generation whichudemploy coal as a primary source of energy. This assessment focused on the impacts from the power plantsudsuch as the emissions, resource consumption, and energy use of all processes required for the power plantudto operate, including any necessary waste disposal and material recycling.udTwo technologies were selected. A PCC plant which represents the average emissions and efficiencies ofudcurrently operating coal-fired power plants in the world, and an IGCC plant which uses combustible gasudderived from an UCG plant, hence a UCG-IGCC plant. The results of the LCA suggest that UCG-IGCCudtechnology is more sustainable than the conventional PCC technology. The results yielded significantudreductions in environmental stressors related to air, water, resource consumption and waste used in theudimpact assessment.udUltimately, LCA can be seen to be an ideal integrated environmental management tool to facilitateuddecision making on competing technologies to be deployed by assessing them throughout their entire lifeudcycles.
机译:在当前优先考虑可持续发展以利于当前和未来 udgeneration的全球气候中,有必要对部署的技术类型做出明智的决定。 ud因为煤炭在发电中起着如此重要的作用,理解它对环境的影响是总体上了解能源和环境问题的重要组成部分。为此,对两种发电方法进行了生命周期评估(LCA),这两种方法都以煤炭为主要能源。该评估的重点是发电厂的影响,例如发电厂运行所需的所有过程的排放,资源消耗和能源使用,包括任何必要的废物处理和材料回收。选择了两种技术。一个PCC装置代表世界上目前正在运行的燃煤电厂的平均排放量和效率,另一个IGCC装置使用从UCG装置(因此称为UCG-IGCC装置)衍生的可燃气体。 LCA的结果表明,UCG-IGCC ud技术比常规PCC技术更具可持续性。结果显着降低了影响评估中使用的与空气,水,资源消耗和废物有关的环境压力。最终,LCA可以看作是一种理想的综合环境管理工具,可以促进对竞争技术的决策。通过评估他们的整个生命周期来部署它们。

著录项

  • 作者

    Meintjies Curtis Enrico;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号