首页> 外文OA文献 >Development of testing methods for comparative assessment of Thin Spray-on Liner (TSL) shear and tensile properties.
【2h】

Development of testing methods for comparative assessment of Thin Spray-on Liner (TSL) shear and tensile properties.

机译:开发用于比较评估薄喷涂衬里(TSL)剪切和拉伸性能的测试方法。

摘要

Spray-on linings in the form of shotcrete have been in use in the mining industry for the past 60 years. The introduction of Thin Spray-on Liners (TSLs) in mining has been more recent (approximately 20 years). There is no doubt that TSL technology, although it has great potential for success, will go through an extremely difficult implementation period as was experienced by shotcrete. Publications describing successful TSL application experiences have started to emerge. However, confusion and carelessness regarding standards, specifications, and design guidelines around the world will have to be addressed to overcome the teething problems experienced by the new TSL technology. There are still many aspects of TSLs that need to be investigated to provide information necessary to formulate a proper TSL design. This thesis is intended to bridge some of the knowledge gaps existing in the area of the mechanical property testing of TSLs.udA literature review provides the background to the concept of TSL technology and gives a summary of the previous testing methods performed to date. The shortcomings of these testing methods are emphasised and their applicability as standard testing methodologies is discussed. In the absence of sound test methods, the assessment of TSL suitability and performance is mainly based on opinion or short term visual observations at mine sites. The description and reporting of previous testing on TSLs, in general, have not been done appropriately and have often been found to lack critical information. Therefore, the absence of generally agreed testing methods results in a lack of parameters which are important in evaluating the quality and performance capabilities of available TSL products. For this reason, the development of appropriate and acceptable testing methods for TSLs is urgently needed so that design standards and requirements can be formulated.udThis thesis focuses on four laboratory testing methods. The development of two new laboratory testing methods for the quantification of mechanical properties of TSLs is described, namely, shear-bond strength testing and material shear strength testing. In addition, two other existing testing methodologies were adopted with minor modifications and included in the TSL testing programme. These are material tensile strength testing and tensile-bond strength testing. Large numbers of tests were carried out for each method as part of the research described. The results of all four testing methodologies have been collated and analysed in an attempt to make the comparison of the mechanical properties of various TSLs and shotcrete possible.udEach of the four testing methodologies is allocated a single chapter of the thesis, with particular focus on the details of the test considerations, and descriptions of apparatus, specimen preparation and test procedures. The results of testing are provided and analysed for the comparison of TSL performance in each of these chapters. A collective and comparative analysis and discussion on the test results is included.udApproximately 4000 tests were performed on 32 TSL products from 12 companies as well as one brand of plain shotcrete. Various factors such as temperature, humidity, substrate type and condition, rate of loading, specimen size, and storage duration significantly influence the performance of TSLs. All of these factors were considered, but their values or conditions remained fixed in the testing programme to limit the number of tests. However, an exception was the curing time, which was selected as the main test variable. Curing times from 1 day to 28 days were used in all the tests.udSubsequent analysis of the test results for the new testing methods provides a comparison of TSLs based on the measured strength properties. Comparison of TSL with shotcrete strength has also been possible through the same test methods, which have not been performed on shotcrete before. The test results also show an obvious strength increase with increasing curing time as expected. The simplicity and ease of performing these tests and the easy understanding of results compared with previous TSL testing has assisted in their general acceptance. The response from the mining industry and the product manufacturers towards the testing methodologies developed under the scope of the research in this thesis has been positive. The test results have been well received and have been used with confidence in the selection, quality control and comparative assessment of TSLs. The extensive laboratory testing programme and the development of two new laboratory testing methods for TSLs, described in this thesis are considered to be a significant contribution to the state of the art of TSL technology. The database of test results and findings from this research can be used by liner manufacturers as a reference for the comparison of their products. Further improvements and development of new TSL products with better qualities will then assist in the further implementation of TSLs in the mining and civil engineering industries.
机译:在过去的60年中,喷射混凝土形式的喷射衬里已在采矿业中使用。在采矿业中引入稀薄喷涂衬里(TSL)的最新情况(大约20年)。毫无疑问,TSL技术尽管具有巨大的成功潜力,但将经历喷射混凝土经历的极其困难的实施时期。描述成功的TSL应用经验的出版物已经开始出现。但是,必须解决世界各地有关标准,规范和设计指南的困惑和疏忽,以克服新的TSL技术所遇到的初期问题。 TSL仍然有许多方面需要研究,以提供制定适当的TSL设计所必需的信息。本文旨在弥补TSL力学性能测试领域中存在的一些知识空白。 ud文献综述为TSL技术的概念提供了背景知识,并总结了迄今为止执行的先前测试方法。强调了这些测试方法的缺点,并讨论了它们作为标准测试方法的适用性。在没有完善的测试方法的情况下,TSL适用性和性能的评估主要基于矿场的意见或短期目视观察。通常,对TSL的先前测试的描述和报告通常未适当完成,并且经常发现缺少关键信息。因此,缺乏普遍认可的测试方法会导致缺少参数,这些参数对于评估可用TSL产品的质量和性能至关重要。因此,迫切需要开发适当且可接受的TSL测试方法,以便制定设计标准和要求。 ud本文主要针对四种实验室测试方法。描述了用于量化TSL力学性能的两种新的实验室测试方法的发展,即剪切粘结强度测试和材料剪切强度测试。此外,还采用了另外两种现有的测试方法,并对它们进行了微小的修改,并将其包括在TSL测试计划中。这些是材料拉伸强度测试和拉伸粘结强度测试。作为研究的一部分,每种方法都进行了大量测试。为了对各种TSL和喷射混凝土的力学性能进行比较,已对所有四种测试方法的结果进行了整理和分析。 ud每种四种测试方法均分配了论文的一章,特别着重于测试注意事项的详细信息,以及仪器,样品制备和测试程序的说明。提供了测试结果并进行了分析,以比较每章中的TSL性能。 ud对来自12家公司的32种TSL产品以及一个品牌的普通喷射混凝土进行了大约4000次测试。温度,湿度,基材类型和条件,上样速率,样品大小和储存时间等各种因素都会显着影响TSL的性能。考虑了所有这些因素,但是它们的值或条件在测试程序中保持固定,以限制测试次数。但是,固化时间例外,它被选作主要测试变量。所有测试均使用1天至28天的固化时间。 ud随后对新测试方法的测试结果进行分析,可以根据测得的强度特性对TSL进行比较。通过相同的测试方法也可以将TSL与喷射混凝土强度进行比较,而以前从未在喷射混凝土上进行过测试。测试结果还表明,随着预期固化时间的增加,强度明显增加。与以前的TSL测试相比,执行这些测试的简便性以及对结果的轻松理解有助于其被普遍接受。采矿业和产品制造商对本文研究范围内开发的测试方法的反应是积极的。测试结果受到了好评,并被用于TSL的选择,质量控制和比较评估。广泛的实验室测试计划以及针对TSL的两种新实验室测试方法的开发本文中描述的,被认为对TSL技术的发展做出了重大贡献。这项研究的测试结果和发现的数据库可被班轮制造商用作比较其产品的参考。然后,进一步改进和开发具有更高质量的TSL新产品,将有助于在采矿和土木工程行业中进一步实施TSL。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yilmaz Halil.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号