首页> 外文OA文献 >‘Nechto Eroticheskoe’, 'Courir après l'ombre'? – logistical imperatives and the fall of Tashkent, 1859 – 1865
【2h】

‘Nechto Eroticheskoe’, 'Courir après l'ombre'? – logistical imperatives and the fall of Tashkent, 1859 – 1865

机译:‘Nechto Eroticheskoe’,‘Couriraprèsl'ombre’? –后勤要务和塔什干的陷落,1859年-1865年

摘要

This article explores the debates that preceded the Russian conquest of Tashkent in 1865. It argues that none of the explanations usually given for this – the ‘men on the spot’, ‘cotton hunger’, or the Great Game with Britain – is satisfactory. Instead, it shows that the War Ministry and the governors of Orenburg had advocated the capture of Tashkent from the late 1850s, and that General Cherniaev's assault in 1865 was at least tacitly authorized. The motives for the Russian advance combined the need for better supply chains to the steppe fortresses, a desire to ‘anchor’ their new frontier in a region with a sedentary population, and concern for security from attacks by the Khoqand Khanate. Economic considerations and rivalry with Britain played very minor roles.
机译:本文探讨了在1865年俄罗斯征服塔什干之前的辩论。它认为,对此通常没有给出任何解释,如“当场的人”,“棉饥饿”或与英国的大赛。相反,它表明,战争部和奥伦堡州长主张从1850年代后期占领塔什干,并且至少在默认情况下至少批准了切尔尼亚涅夫将军于1865年的袭击。俄罗斯前进的动机结合了对更好的草原要塞供应链的需求,渴望在一个久坐不动的人口地区“锚定”他们的新边疆的愿望,以及对安全性的担心,以防科赫坎德汗国的袭击。经济因素和与英国的竞争起着很小的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morrison Alexander Stephen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号