首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative study of rans turbulence models for impinging jet simulations
【2h】

Comparative study of rans turbulence models for impinging jet simulations

机译:冲击射流模拟的rans湍流模型的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Impinging plane jets are flow configurations with applications in many fields. The ability of several turbulence models to simulate this kind of flow was assessed. The numerical results were compared with the data of Cooper et al. (1993) for Re=7.0 104 and a jet nozzle aspect ratio H/D=6, and Re=2.3 104 and H/D=2. The SST, RSM-ε and RSM-BSL turbulence models were chosen because of their capability to predict flows with high streamline curvature and their expected good accuracy on near wall flow. The results show that the SST and RSM- ε perform better than the RSM-BSL in the prediction of the mean velocity profiles in the wall-jet and impact zone. The profiles of turbulent energy were particularly difficult to reproduce. All the turbulence models considered here exhibit a similar behavior with respect to the profiles of turbulent energy. The paper shows again the complexity of turbulent impinging jets and the relevant open challenges in CFD
机译:撞击式平面射流是在许多领域中应用的流量配置。评估了几种湍流模型模拟这种流动的能力。将数值结果与Cooper等人的数据进行了比较。 (1993)对于Re = 7.0 104和喷嘴纵横比H / D = 6,以及Re = 2.3 104和H / D = 2。选择SST,RSM-ε和RSM-BSL湍流模型是因为它们具有预测高流线曲率的流量的能力以及在近壁流方面预期的良好精度。结果表明,SST和RSM-ε在预测壁面射流和撞击区的平均速度分布方面比RSM-BSL更好。湍流能量的分布特别难以复制。此处考虑的所有湍流模型在湍流能量分布方面表现出相似的行为。本文再次展示了湍流冲击射流的复杂性以及CFD中的相关开放挑战

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号