首页> 外文OA文献 >Lecture Note-taking in Postsecondary Students with Self-Reported Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
【2h】

Lecture Note-taking in Postsecondary Students with Self-Reported Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

机译:自我报告的注意缺陷/多动症的高中生的讲课笔记

摘要

Taking and reviewing lecture notes is a prevalent activity that is related to higher test performance in higher education. Yet few studies have focused on the underlying cognitive variables related to lecture note-taking. The current study is an extension of previous studies on lecture note-taking (Peverly & Garner, 2010; Peverly et al., 2007; Peverly et al., 2010) to a disability population, specifically students reporting clinically significant symptoms of ADHD. The primary purpose of this dissertation was to determine if disability differences in lecture note-taking exist, and if they do, to examine the cognitive variables that might explain them. Participants included 22 postsecondary students with self-reported ADHD and 50 postsecondary students who served as controls. Students took notes on a videotaped lecture, reviewed their notes, and took a written recall test. The independent variables included disability status (i.e., self-reported ADHD and non-ADHD), attention, transcription fluency, verbal working memory, and listening comprehension. The dependent variables were quality of notes and essay performance. All measures were group administered. Results revealed that attention and listening comprehension were the only predictors of quality of notes, and disability status, quality of notes, and listening comprehension all predicted essay performance. Students with self-reported ADHD obtained lower scores on a written recall test and a measure of transcription fluency compared to non-ADHD peers, but did not differ in terms of quality of notes, attention, verbal working memory, or listening comprehension. There were also differences between males and females in terms of notes' quality and essay performance. Future research should examine the present findings in postsecondary students with confirmed ADHD to test for possible differences in outcomes due to confirmed versus self-reported diagnoses.
机译:记录和复习讲义是一项普遍的活动,与高等教育中更高的考试成绩有关。然而,很少有研究关注与演讲笔记相关的潜在认知变量。当前的研究是对以前的演讲笔记研究(Peverly&Garner,2010; Peverly等,2007; Peverly等,2010)的扩展,扩展到了残障人群,特别是报告了多动症临床上明显症状的学生。本文的主要目的是确定笔记笔记中是否存在残疾差异,如果存在,则检查可能解释这些差异的认知变量。参加者包括22名自我报告为多动症的大专生和50名作为对照的大专生。学生在录像讲课上做笔记,查看笔记,并进行书面回忆测试。自变量包括残疾状态(即自我报告的多动症和非多动症),注意力,转录流畅性,口头工作记忆和听力理解。因变量是笔记的质量和论文的表现。所有措施均分组管理。结果表明,注意力和听力理解是音符质量的唯一预测指标,而残疾状态,音符质量和听力理解都可以预测论文的表现。与非ADHD的同龄人相比,具有自我报告的ADHD的学生在书面回忆测验和转录流畅度方面得分较低,但在音符,注意力,口头工作记忆或听力理解方面没有差异。在笔记质量和论文表现方面,男性和女性之间也存在差异。未来的研究应该检查患有ADHD的高中生的当前发现,以检验由于确诊与自我报告的诊断而导致的结果差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vekaria Pooja Chhagan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号