首页> 外文OA文献 >Examining the Influence of Goal Attainment Scaling on Changes in Goal Attainment in a Coaching Versus Non-Coaching Context
【2h】

Examining the Influence of Goal Attainment Scaling on Changes in Goal Attainment in a Coaching Versus Non-Coaching Context

机译:在教练与非教练的背景下研究目标达成比例对目标达成变化的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study examined the impact of two interventions on goal attainment: Goal attainment scaling (GAS) and coaching. Participants identified a goal they were motivated to pursue over the course of approximately 4 weeks. Half the participants received coaching to support their goal attainment and half did not, while all participants were randomly assigned to either a GAS or No-GAS condition. GAS is an interview technique in which the researcher (1) discusses how the goal articulated connects to the participant's "big picture" objective and (2) identifies potential "micro" outcomes that are specific and behavioral. GAS is a recognized outcome assessment technique originally created for the mental health field (Kiresuk & Sherman, 1968) but has been applied in numerous contexts over the past forty two years, including educational settings (Schlosser, 2004). It has been suggested that the technique may facilitate the goal attainment of participants, and recently that GAS may work well with coaching (Spence, 2007). This study was the first to examine the intersection of the two techniques' influence on goal attainment. Results indicate that the effectiveness of the interventions depended on the type of goal articulated by participants (career versus personal), whether it was a "big picture" or "micro" goal, and the degree of conscientiousness of participants.
机译:这项研究检查了两种干预措施对目标达成的影响:目标达成扩展(GAS)和指导。参与者确定了他们在大约4周的时间内追求的目标。一半的参与者接受了指导以支持他们达到目标的教练,而另一半则没有,而所有参与者都被随机分配为GAS或No-GAS条件。 GAS是一种访谈技术,研究人员(1)讨论要表达的目标如何与参与者的“大局”目标联系起来,并且(2)确定潜在的“微观”结果,这些结果是特定的和行为性的。 GAS是一种公认​​的成果评估技术,最初是针对精神健康领域创建的(Kiresuk&Sherman,1968),但在过去的四十二年来,它已被广泛应用于各种场合,包括教育环境(Schlosser,2004)。已经提出,该技术可以促进参与者达到目标,最近,GAS可以很好地与教练合作(Spence,2007年)。这项研究是第一个研究两种技术对目标达成的影响的交集。结果表明,干预措施的有效性取决于参与者阐明的目标类型(职业还是个人),是否是“大目标”或“微观”目标以及参与者的认真程度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Prywes Yaron;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号