首页> 外文OA文献 >Theorizing Planning Practice: Collaborative Planning for Smart Growth on Long Island, New York
【2h】

Theorizing Planning Practice: Collaborative Planning for Smart Growth on Long Island, New York

机译:理论规划实践:纽约长岛的智能增长协作规划

摘要

This thesis explores how an ostensible tension between communicative and new urbanist planning theories is played out in practice. In collaborative planning processes that promote compact development, do professional planners facilitate public engagement, or do they advocate for smart growth, and are these roles mutually exclusive? The methodology for addressing this question is based on a qualitative research design that comprises semi-structured, open-ended interviews with public, private, and non-profit sector planners. Long Island, New York is a worthwhile laboratory for this investigation, as a number of progressive municipalities have undertaken collaborative processes -- known as visioning initiatives -- to engage community-driven, bottom-up planning for downtown redevelopment around Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) stations. This thesis demonstrates that planners effectively balance the roles of facilitation and advocacy in collaborative processes by engaging in shared learning with the local participants. Planners can ethically advocate for smart growth by educating local participants about the benefits of compact development, which, in turn, can facilitate an informed decision-making process among the local participants about the context-specific future of their community. In this way, planners merge their technical expertise with the intangible local knowledge of the participants in the planning process to advance compact development that is appropriately scaled and sensitive to the existing character of the community. Through an investigation of collaborative planning for smart growth on Long Island, this thesis concludes that a comprehensive theory of planning practice must account for the dialectical relationship between process and outcome that defines the planning profession.
机译:本文探讨了如何在实践中解决交际理论与新的城市主义规划理论之间的表面张力。在促进紧凑型发展的协作计划过程中,专业计划人员是否促进公众参与,还是倡导明智的增长,这些角色是否相互排斥?解决该问题的方法基于定性研究设计,该研究包括对公共,私营和非营利部门计划者的半结构化,开放式访谈。纽约州长岛市是进行这项调查的重要实验室,因为许多先进的市政当局已开展协作流程(即远景规划),以社区为导向,自下而上地规划长岛铁路沿线的市区重建( LIRR)电台。本论文表明,计划者可以通过与当地参与者共享学习来有效地平衡促进和倡导在协作过程中的作用。规划人员可以通过向本地参与者介绍紧凑型开发的好处来在道德上倡导明智的增长,而这反过来又可以促进本地参与者之间关于社区特定情况的未来的知情决策过程。通过这种方式,规划人员将他们的技术专长与参与者在规划过程中无形的本地知识相结合,以促进适当规模的紧凑型开发,并对社区的现有特征敏感。通过对长岛智能增长的协作计划的研究,本论文得出结论,全面的计划实践理论必须考虑定义计划职业的过程与结果之间的辩证关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sokol Maxwell L.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号