首页> 外文OA文献 >Nasogastric Aspiration and Lavage in Emergency Department Patients with Hematochezia or Melena Without Hematemesis
【2h】

Nasogastric Aspiration and Lavage in Emergency Department Patients with Hematochezia or Melena Without Hematemesis

机译:急诊有呕血或黑便的急诊患者的鼻胃抽吸和灌洗

摘要

Objectives:  The utility of nasogastric aspiration and lavage in the emergency management of patients with melena or hematochezia without hematemesis is controversial. This evidence-based emergency medicine review evaluates the following question: does nasogastric aspiration and lavage in patients with melena or hematochezia and no hematemesis differentiate an upper from lower source of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding? Methods:  MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and other databases were searched. Studies were selected for inclusion in the review if the authors had performed nasogastric aspiration (with or without lavage) in all patients with hematochezia or melena and performed esophagogastroduodenal endoscopy (EGD) in all patients. Studies were excluded if they enrolled patients with history of esophageal varices or included patients with hematemesis or coffee ground emesis (unless the data for patients without hematemesis or coffee ground emesis could be separated out). The outcome was identifying upper GI hemorrhage (active bleeding or high-risk lesions potentially responsible for hemorrhage) and the rate of complications associated with the nasogastric tube insertion. Quality of the included studies was assessed using standard criteria for diagnostic accuracy studies. Results:  Three retrospective studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The prevalence of an upper GI source for patients with melena or hematochezia without hematemesis was 32% to 74%. According to the included studies, the diagnostic performance of the nasogastric aspiration and lavage for predicting upper GI bleeding is poor. The sensitivity of this test ranged from 42% to 84%, the specificity from 54% to 91%, and negative likelihood ratios from 0.62 to 0.20. Only one study reported the rate complications associated with nasogastric aspiration and lavage (1.6%). Conclusions:  Nasogastric aspiration, with or without lavage, has a low sensitivity and poor negative likelihood ratio, which limits its utility in ruling out an upper GI source of bleeding in patients with melena or hematochezia without hematemesis.
机译:目的:在无呕血的黑便或便血患者的紧急处理中,鼻胃抽吸和灌洗的实用性引起争议。这项基于证据的急诊医学评论评估了以下问题:黑便或血便患者且无呕血患者的鼻胃抽吸和灌洗是否能区分上消化道出血和下消化道出血?方法:检索MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane库和其他数据库。如果作者对所有患有便血或黑便的患者进行了鼻胃镜抽吸(有或没有灌洗),并且对所有患者均进行了食管胃十二指肠内镜检查(EGD),则将研究纳入研究。如果研究招募有食管静脉曲张病史的患者,或纳入有呕血或咖啡渣呕吐的患者,则该研究被排除(除非可以将没有呕血或咖啡渣呕吐的患者的数据分开)。结果是确定上消化道出血(活动性出血或可能导致出血的高风险病变)以及与鼻胃管插入相关的并发症发生率。使用诊断准确性研究的标准标准评估纳入研究的质量。结果:三项回顾性研究符合我们的纳入和排除标准。没有呕血的黑便或便血患者的上消化道源患病率为32%至74%。根据纳入的研究,鼻胃抽吸和灌洗对上消化道出血的诊断性能较差。该测试的灵敏度范围从42%到84%,特异性从54%到91%,负似然比从0.62到0.20。只有一项研究报告了鼻胃抽吸和灌洗相关的并发症发生率(1.6%)。结论:有或没有灌洗的鼻胃抽吸术敏感性低,阴性可能性比差,这限制了它在排除黑便或呕血而无呕血的患者中排除上消化道出血的来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号