首页> 外文OA文献 >Gowanus Gentrified? Community Responses to Gentrification and Economic Development in the Shadow of the Superfund
【2h】

Gowanus Gentrified? Community Responses to Gentrification and Economic Development in the Shadow of the Superfund

机译:Gowanus绅士化了吗?在超级基金的阴影下社区对绅士化和经济发展的回应

摘要

Gowanus is an industrial neighborhood changing into a gentrified area, but it faces such severe pollution that the EPA designated the Gowanus Canal, which bisects the area, a Superfund site in 2010. The industry still in Gowanus includes a mix of traditional industrial businesses, craft industries, and artists, but they might disappear if developers build luxury condos in the neighborhood. This study looks at the clash between activists over how the community has and will change, focusing on the pro-development Gowanus Canal Community Development Corporation and the preservationist and pro-Superfund Friends and Residents of Greater Gowanus. Many local activists embrace the vision of Gowanus as a place for making things and hope to maintain industry. Even though industry left the neighborhood polluted, most do not connect the two. The Superfund seeks to clean up the neighborhood but it may pave the way for environmental gentrification, which is the pollution cleanup causing gentrification. However, fears of the Superfund harming home prices do not appear to be true; GIS analysis shows that land closest to environmental hazards increased the most in value. Residents also hope to avoid the experiences of other New York neighborhoods, which saw gentrification cause displacement. More than residential displacement, though, activists worry about the culture of Gowanus disappearing and hope to save it. Their remedies such as historic preservation and zoning Gowanus for mixed use may not be effective or viable, though. Both major groups seem to accept the idea that attracting the creative class is crucial to economic success, and that they should make efforts to attract creatives to the area. However supporters of industry extend the definition of creative class from white-collar professionals to include blue-collar workers manufacturing custom-made designed products. Because of a lack of government involvement or a unified community forum, there is no clear path for resolving those differences and planning for the future, but a system of participatory planning could help resolve conflicts and develop plans to permit changes in ways that don't destroy the Gowanus community.
机译:戈瓦努斯(Gowanus)是一个工业化社区,现已转变为高档化区域,但面临着如此严重的污染,以至于EPA于2010年指定了超级基金所在地Gowanus运河(将该区域一分为二)。行业和艺术家,但如果开发商在附近建造豪华公寓,它们可能会消失。这项研究着眼于维权人士在社区如何发生和将要发生的变化方面的冲突,重点是赞成发展的Gowanus运河社区发展公司以及保护主义者和亲超级基金的大瓜瓦努斯之友和居民。许多当地激进主义者拥护Gowanus作为制造事物的理想,并希望维持工业。即使工业使附近地区受到污染,大多数地区还是无法将两者联系在一起。超级基金试图清理附近地区,但它可能为环境高档化铺平道路,这是导致高档化的污染清除。然而,对于超级基金损害房价的担忧似乎并不成立。 GIS分析表明,最接近环境危害的土地增值最大。居民还希望避免看到其他纽约居民区的经历,这些地区看到高档化导致流离失所。然而,激进主义者不仅担心戈瓦努斯文化的消失,而且还希望保存下来,这不仅仅是居民流离失所。但是,它们的补救措施(例如历史保护和将Gowanus划为混合用途)可能无效或不可行。两个主要团体似乎都接受吸引创意阶层对经济成功至关重要的想法,他们应该努力吸引创意人才到该地区。但是,行业支持者将创意阶层的定义从白领专业人员扩展到包括制造定制设计产品的蓝领工人。由于缺乏政府的参与或缺乏统一的社区论坛,因此没有明确的途径来解决这些分歧并为未来做计划,但是参与式计划系统可以帮助解决冲突并制定计划,允许采取不允许改变的方式摧毁Gowanus社区。

著录项

  • 作者

    Spitzer-Rubenstein Michael;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号