首页> 外文OA文献 >Youth Reports of Psychological Maltreatment, Social Anxiety, and Aggression: Evaluating Rejection Sensitivity as a Mediator
【2h】

Youth Reports of Psychological Maltreatment, Social Anxiety, and Aggression: Evaluating Rejection Sensitivity as a Mediator

机译:关于心理虐待,社交焦虑和侵略的青年报道:评估拒绝敏感性作为中介者

摘要

This study investigated two models evaluating rejection sensitivity as a mediator. One model examined rejection sensitivity as a mediator between caregiver psychological maltreatment and social anxiety, controlling for physical and sexual abuse. The second model tested rejection sensitivity as a mediator between psychological maltreatment and aggression, controlling for physical and sexual abuse. Of the different forms of child maltreatment, psychological maltreatment is proposed to be the strongest predictor of and have the most enduring impact on negative outcomes such as those evaluated in this study. To evaluate the impact of psychological maltreatment on these variables, a comprehensive measure of psychological maltreatment was used, and physical and sexual abuse were measured and controlled for. A total of 136 ninth grade boys attending an all-male Catholic high school in a low-income neighborhood were administered the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychological Maltreatment-Child Version (Brassard, Hart, Diaz, & Rivelis, 2011), Children's Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (Downey, Lebolt, Rincón, & Freitas, 1998), the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (La Greca & Lopez, 1998), Youth Self Report Form-Aggression Scale (Achenbach, 1991), and the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale (Straus, Hamby, Finkelhor, Moore, & Runyan, 1998). Analyses utilized the data of 117 subjects. Significant proportions of the sample reported high levels of psychological maltreatment (68% reported three or more behaviors at a significant level over the past year) and physical abuse (71% reported corporal punishment twice or more in the past year); 24% of the sample reported rejection sensitivity above the median of possible scores; 22% of the sample reported clinically significant levels of social anxiety; 14% of the sample reported borderline or clinically significant levels of aggression; 7% of all respondents reported either experiencing sexual abuse or did not respond to this item. Mediation hypotheses were tested using Hayes' (2013) conditional process analysis. The results supported both mediation models. In the model evaluating the relationship between psychological maltreatment and social anxiety through rejection sensitivity as a mediator, the indirect effect was determined to be significant based on a bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval for the indirect effect (ab = .30) that was above zero (.004 to .730). The direct effect was not significant in this model, indicating that psychological maltreatment did not impact social anxiety independent of its effect on rejection sensitivity. The model explained 37.4% of the variance in social anxiety. The indirect effect for the model testing rejection sensitivity as a mediator between psychological maltreatment and aggression (ab = .04) was also found to be significant based on a bootstrap confidence interval above zero (.002 to .131). The direct effect in this model was significant, pointing to psychological maltreatment's influence on aggression independent of its effect on rejection sensitivity. The model explained 16.7% of the variance in aggression. Based on effect sizes, the sample size in this study was not adequate to establish sufficient (.80) power for mediation analyses. As this study is cross-sectional, the temporal sequence of the development of these constructs cannot be confirmed, though theory does suggest that psychological maltreatment leads to rejection sensitivity, social anxiety, and aggression and that rejection sensitivity precedes social anxiety and aggression. Implications for treatment and directions for future research were discussed.
机译:这项研究调查了两种模型,以评估拒绝敏感性为媒介。一种模型研究了排斥敏感性作为照顾者心理虐待与社交焦虑之间的中介,控制身体和性虐待。第二个模型测试了排斥敏感性作为心理虐待和侵略之间的中介,控制了身体和性虐待。在各种形式的儿童虐待中,心理虐待被认为是负面结果的最强预测因素,并且对本研究评估的负面结果具有最持久的影响。为了评估心理虐待对这些变量的影响,我们使用了心理虐待的综合衡量方法,并对身体和性虐待进行了测量和控制。在低收入社区中,共有136名在全男性天主教高中就读的九年级男孩接受了《心理虐待儿童版综合评估》(Brassard,Hart,Diaz和Rivelis,2011年),《儿童排斥敏感性问卷》( Downey,Lebolt,Rincón和Freitas,1998年),青少年社交焦虑量表(La Greca和Lopez,1998年),青年自我报告形式攻击量表(Achenbach,1991年),以及亲子冲突策略量表(Straus) ,Hamby,Finkelhor,Moore和Runyan,1998年)。分析利用了117名受试者的数据。样本中有很大比例报告了很高的心理虐待程度(68%的人在过去一年中报告了三种或更多的显着水平的行为)和身体虐待(71%的人报告了过去一年中两次或更多次的体罚); 24%的样本表示排斥敏感性高于可能得分的中位数; 22%的样本报告了社交焦虑的临床水平; 14%的样本报告其侵略性处于临界或临床水平;在所有受访者中,有7%的人报告遭受了性虐待或对此项目没有回应。使用Hayes(2013)的条件过程分析测试了调解假设。结果支持两种调解模型。在通过排斥敏感性作为中介评估心理虐待与社交焦虑之间关系的模型中,间接偏倚被确定为显着,其基于偏倚校正后的间接影响自举置信区间(ab = .30)大于零(.004至.730)。在该模型中,直接影响并不显着,表明心理虐待不会影响社交焦虑,无论其对排斥敏感性的影响如何。该模型解释了37.4%的社交焦虑差异。基于高于零的自举置信区间(.002至.131),还发现模型测试排斥敏感性作为心理虐待与攻击之间的中介(ab = .04)的间接影响也很显着。该模型的直接影响是显着的,表明心理虐待对攻击的影响独立于其对排斥敏感性的影响。该模型解释了侵略性差异的16.7%。基于效应量,本研究的样本量不足以建立足够(.80)的中介分析能力。由于这项研究是横断面的,因此无法确定这些结构的发展的时间顺序,尽管理论确实表明心理虐待会导致排斥敏感性,社交焦虑和攻击性,而排斥敏感性先于社交焦虑和攻击性。讨论了治疗的意义和未来研究的方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Edwards Aquilla;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号