首页> 外文OA文献 >The (Im)possibility of 'Standard Technical Measures' for UGC Websites
【2h】

The (Im)possibility of 'Standard Technical Measures' for UGC Websites

机译:教资会网站的“标准技术措施”的(不可能)可能性

摘要

In today's highly litigious legal landscape, one might doubt that there could ever be an "open, fair, voluntary" agreement between copyright owners and service providers to police infringement. Congress nevertheless envisioned such a consensus when it developed § (i) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA): "Conditions for [Safe Harbor] Eligibility." An often-overlooked provision of the DMCA, § 512(i) directs right holders and Internet service providers to work together and agree on "standard technical measures" to "identify or protect copyrighted works." In addition to being the product of consensus, these measures must be "available . . . on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms" and also "not impose substantial costs . . . or substantial burdens." Although ostensibly thorough, these guidelines are too imprecise and elusive to actually guide service providers and right holders toward a consensus; the term "standard technical measures" remains undefined and possibly undefinable more than a decade after passage.
机译:在当今诉讼激烈的法律环境中,人们可能会怀疑版权拥有者和服务提供商之间是否可能存在一项“开放,公平,自愿”的协议,以防止警察侵权。然而,国会在制定《数字千年版权法案》(DMCA)的第(i)节时就构想出这样的共识:“ [安全港]资格的条件”。 DMCA的第512(i)条经常被忽视,它指示权利持有人和互联网服务提供商共同合作,并商定“识别或保护受版权保护的作品”的“标准技术措施”。这些措施除了是达成共识的产物外,还必须“……以合理和非歧视性的条件提供”,并且“不得施加……的巨额成本或负担”。尽管表面上看似详尽,但这些指导仍然不够精确和难以捉摸,无法实际指导服务提供商和权利持有者达成共识。 “标准技术措施”一词在通过后的十多年中仍未定义,可能不确定。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gallo Lauren G.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号