首页> 外文OA文献 >Virtual colonoscopy, optical colonoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Virtual colonoscopy, optical colonoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial

机译:用于结肠直肠癌筛查的虚拟结肠镜检查,光学结肠镜检查或粪便潜血测试:一项随机对照试验的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background No head-to-head randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the superiority of one colorectal screening modality over another in reducing colorectal cancer mortality. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), optical colonoscopy (OC), and virtual colonoscopy (VC), to inform the planning of a larger evaluative trial. Methods Eligible patients (aged 50 to 70) were recruited from five primary care practices in Hamilton, ON, Canada, between March 23, 2010 and August 11, 2010, and randomized 1:1:1 in a parallel design using an automated, centralized telephone service to either FOBT, OC, or VC. To reflect conventional practice, patients received no additional reminders to complete their allocated screening test beyond those received in usual practice. The primary outcome was completion of the assigned screening procedure. Results of the index test and any follow-up investigations were ascertained at 6 months. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were not blinded to group assignment. The trial was stopped early due to lack of ongoing funding. Results A total of 198 participants were enrolled, of whom 67 were allocated to FOBT, 66 to OC, and 65 to VC. The allocated screening procedure was completed by 43 (64 %) subjects allocated to FOBT (95 % confidence interval [CI], 52–75 %), 53 (80 %) subjects allocated to OC (95 % CI, 69–88 %), and 50 (77 %) subjects allocated to VC (95 % CI, 65–85 %); because the trial stopped early, we had insufficient statistical power to detect clinically relevant differences in completion rates. During 6 months follow-up, colorectal adenomas were detected in 0 (0 %) subjects allocated to FOBT, 12 (18 %) subjects allocated to OC, and 2 (3 %) subjects allocated to VC. One subject in the OC arm had histological evidence of high-grade dysplasia. No subjects were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Conclusions In this pilot randomized controlled trial of colorectal cancer screening in a primary care setting, 64–80 % of subjects completed their allocated screening test. These findings may be of value to investigators planning clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00865527. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00865527
机译:摘要背景尚无一项头对头的随机对照试验证明一种结直肠癌筛查方法在降低结直肠癌死亡率方面优于另一种筛查方法。我们进行了粪便潜血试验(FOBT),光学结肠镜检查(OC)和虚拟结肠镜检查(VC)的试验性随机对照试验,以为更大的评估试验的规划提供依据。方法在2010年3月23日至2010年8月11日之间,从加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿市的五种初级护理实践中招募了50到70岁的合格患者,并采用自动化,集中化的平行设计以1:1的比例将其随机分组FOBT,OC或VC的电话服务。为了反映常规做法,除了常规做法外,患者没有收到其他提醒来完成分配的筛查测试。主要结果是完成指定的筛查程序。在6个月时确定指数测试的结果和任何后续调查。参加者,看护者和结果评估者不对小组分配不知情。由于缺乏持续的资金,该试验被提早终止。结果总共招募了198位参与者,其中67位被分配给FOBT,66位分配给OC,65位分配给VC。分配的筛查程序由分配给FOBT的43(64%)名受试者(95%置信区间[CI],52–75%),分配给OC的53(80%)名受试者(95%CI,69–88%)完成,以及50(77%)名受试者被分配给VC(95%CI,65-85%);由于该试验提早终止,因此我们没有足够的统计能力来检测临床相关的完成率差异。在6个月的随访期间,在分配给FOBT的0(0%)个受试者,分配给OC的12个(18%)受试者和分配给VC的2个(3%)受试者中检测到了结直肠腺瘤。 OC臂中的一名受试者具有高度不典型增生的组织学证据。没有受试者被诊断为结肠直肠癌。结论在这项在初级保健机构中进行的大肠癌筛查的随机对照试验中,64-80%的受试者完成了分配的筛查测试。这些发现对于计划进行临床试验以评估结肠直肠癌筛查有效性的研究人员可能具有价值。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00865527。 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00865527

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号