首页> 外文OA文献 >This is Spot Dike J: An Analysis of Archaeological Materials Recovered from a Multi-Component Site in Pierce County, WI

【2h】

This is Spot Dike J: An Analysis of Archaeological Materials Recovered from a Multi-Component Site in Pierce County, WI

机译：这是Spot Dike J：从威斯康星州皮尔斯县的一个多地点遗址中回收的考古材料的分析

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Spot Dike J (47PI559) is a multi-component archaeological site, located along the Mississippi River in Pierce County, WI. It was surveyed in 2003 by the USACE, and the recovered artifacts constituted the focus of this project. Through mapping material distribution across the site, as well as analysis of 47PI559 against comparable sites and the available literature, the original site classification as ‘campsite/village’ was determined to be accurate insofar as it is a sufficiently broad term. This project expanded knowledge regarding the timeframe for 47PI559’s occupation, the particulars of its use, and its role within the broader regional and national contexts.

机译：Spot Dike J（47PI559）是一个多部分考古遗址，位于威斯康星州皮尔斯县的密西西比河沿岸。 USACE在2003年对其进行了调查，回收的文物构成了该项目的重点。通过绘制整个站点的材料分布图，并根据可比较的站点和现有文献对47PI559进行分析，可以确定原始站点分类为“露营地/村庄”，因为它是一个足够广泛的术语。该项目扩展了有关47PI559的职业时间表，其使用细节及其在更广泛的地区和国家范围内的作用的知识。

著录项

作者
Holt Laura E;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2013
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. African terra sigillata from Henchir Es-Srira archaeological site, central Tunisia: Archaeological provenance and raw materials based on chemical analysis [J] . Siwar Baklouti, Lara Maritan, Nejia Laridhi Ouazaa, Applied clay science . 2015,第mara期

机译：突尼斯中部汉切尔·埃斯·斯里拉（Henchir Es-Srira）考古遗址的非洲terra sigillata：基于化学分析的考古起源和原材料
2. Ecological analysis of Acari recovered from coprolites from archaeological site of Northeast Brazil [J] . Antonio Nascimento Duarte, Gilberto Salles Gazêta, Marinete Amorim, Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz . 2003,第98期

机译：从巴西东北部考古遗址的共proprolites中回收的Acari的生态分析
3. Ecological Analysis of Acari Recovered from Coprolites from Archaeological Site of Northeast Brazil [J] . Rita de Maria Seabra Nogueira de Candanedo Guerra, Gilberto Salles Gaz#234, ta, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz . 2003,第s1期

机译：从巴西东北部考古遗址的腐殖土中回收的of虫的生态分析
4. ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THE OAK HILL VILLAGE SITE (41RK214), RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS [C] . Robert Rogers, Brett Cruse, Maria Cruse, Vision 2000: An environmental commitment . 1997

机译：得克萨斯州RUSK县橡树山村（41RK214）的考古调查
5. Micromorphology, site spatial variation and patterning, and climate change at the Mead Site (XBD-071): A multi-component archaeological site in Interior Alaska. [D] . Gilbert, Phoebe J. 2011

机译：米德遗址（XBD-071）的微观形态，遗址空间变化和格局以及气候变化：阿拉斯加内陆的多组分考古遗址。
6. Analysis of Microbial Community in the Archaeological Ruins of Liangzhu City and Study on Protective Materials [O] . Mingliang Sun, Fengyu Zhang, Xinduo Huang, 2020

机译：良zhu市考古遗址微生物群落分析及保护材料研究。
7. : "This paper deals with the functionality of the flaked stone assemblages from several Neolithic sites of the NE of the Iberian Peninsula. The chronological framework ranges from the mid-6th to the mid-4th millennium cal. BCE, which corresponds to the Early and Middle Neolithic. This long period ranges from the arrival of the first farming communities in the Iberian Peninsula, around 5600-5500 cal. BCE, to 3600-3500 cal. BCE, two millennia later, when Neolithic communities had stably occupied most of the available territory, from the mountainous areas of the Pyrenees to the coastal areas of the Mediterranean.In this context, the NE of the Iberian Peninsula is one of the areas where a major number of use-wear analyses have been carried out, especially for what concerns the Neolithic period. This is mainly due to the interest shown by the directors of the excavations and by the Spanish use-wear specialists as well; both participated and cooperated in order to enlarge the number of contexts studied, making the NE of the Iberian Peninsula one of the areas of Europe with the largest number of ‘functional studies’. As a result, today we have a reliable picture of the type of lithic tools used by the first farming groups, how they were used, and which needs they were satisfying.The methodology employed for this type of analysis is today broadly shared by most use-wear specialists. A stereoscopic microscope is used together with a reflected-light microscope for the analysis of the archaeological specimens. Afterwards, the observed use-wear traces are compared with the traces from experimental tools. This study primarily made use of the tools preserved at the ‘Traceoteque’ of the Institución Milà y Fontanals of the CSIC of Barcelona.This paper presents the results obtained for the different types of analysed sites and the relative lithic assemblages. In this way, tools from different contexts are compared: open-air sites, caves and rock-shelters, pit-sites, burials, and mining sites. Such a diversity of contexts allowed for the exploration of the existence of recurrences and differences in the functionality of the lithic tools from one site to another. The results obtained have also provided information on some aspects related to the economic processes carried out at the different sites, caves, rock-shelters and open-air contexts. It has been possible to gain fresh data on the types of tasks carried out and their relative importance for each site, their relation with the geographical and environmental context and the natural resources available there. In addition, analysing tools recovered from burials – mainly individual inhumations – provided information on the relationships between the buried individuals and the working tools, in particular exploring the relationships between sex and age patterns and the types of tools deposited as goods.In conclusion, use-wear analysis allowed for the exploration of a variety of issues; from technical aspects related to the production and management of the lithic resources to social aspects related to the subsistence activities and the individuals that carried them out." [O] . Gibaja Bao, Juan Francisco, Mazzucco, Niccolo 2015

机译：：“本文研究了伊比利亚半岛东北部几个新石器时代遗址的片状石材组合的功能。时间框架从公元前6世纪中叶到4世纪中叶，分别对应于早期和早期。新石器时代中期，这段时间的长短是从伊比利亚半岛的第一个农业社区到来，大约在公元前5600-5500 cal，到了两千年后的3600-3500 BCE，当时新石器时代的社区稳定地占据了大部分可用土地。从比利牛斯山脉山区到地中海沿岸地区。在这种情况下，伊比利亚半岛东北部是进行过大量使用磨损分析的地区之一，尤其是在关注方面新石器时代，这主要是由于发掘负责人和西班牙使用服装专家表现出的浓厚兴趣；他们参与和合作以扩大孔蒂的数量xts进行了研究，使伊比利亚半岛的NE成为“功能研究”数量最多的欧洲地区之一。结果，今天我们可以可靠地了解第一批耕作小组使用的石器工具的类型，使用方法以及它们满足的需求。今天，大多数使用方法广泛共享用于这种类型的分析的方法穿专家。立体显微镜与反射光显微镜一起用于分析考古样本。然后，将观察到的使用磨损痕迹与实验工具的痕迹进行比较。这项研究主要利用了巴塞罗那CSIC的米拉·丰塔纳尔研究所的“ Traceoteque”中保存的工具。本文介绍了针对不同类型的分析地点和相对石器组合所获得的结果。通过这种方式，可以比较来自不同环境的工具：露天场所，洞穴和岩石避难所，露天场所，埋葬场所和采矿场所。如此多样的上下文允许探索重复性的存在以及从一个站点到另一个站点的石器工具的功能差异。所获得的结果还提供了与在不同地点，洞穴，避难所和露天环境中进行的经济过程有关的某些方面的信息。可以获得有关所执行任务的类型及其对每个站点的相对重要性，它们与地理和环境环境以及那里可用自然资源的关系的新数据。此外，对从墓葬中回收的工具（主要是个人遗体）进行分析，可提供有关被掩埋的个体与工作工具之间关系的信息，尤其是探索性别与年龄模式之间的关系以及作为商品存放的工具的类型。磨损分析允许探索各种问题；从与石器资源的生产和管理有关的技术方面到与自给活动及其实施者有关的社会方面。”
8. Survey and Assessment of Archaeological and Historical Resources to Be Affected by Dike and Revetment Construction along the Mississippi River, Hickman and Fulton Counties, Kentucky. [R] . Fitting, J. E., Weir, D. J., Clagget, S. R., 1976

机译：肯塔基州密西西比河，希克曼和富尔顿县堤防和护岸建设对考古和历史资源的调查和评估。

This is Spot Dike J: An Analysis of Archaeological Materials Recovered from a Multi-Component Site in Pierce County, WI

摘要

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅